All Issue

2025 Vol.34, Issue 4 Preview Page

Original Articles

Application of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging for Assessing the Recovery of Kimchi Cabbage Seedlings from Drought Stress

엽록소 형광 이미지를 활용한 유묘기 배추의 건조 스트레스 회복평가

Gyu-Hyeon Park1*†
,
Junho Lee2†
,
Dong Soo Lee2
,
Hyo In Yoon2
,
Su-Hyun Choi2
,
Yun Soo Choi2
,
Me Hea Park3
박 규현1*†
,
이 준호2†
,
이 동수2
,
윤 효인2
,
최 수현2
,
최 윤수2
,
박 미희3
1Postdoctoral Researcher, Vegetable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Researcher, Vegetable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea
3Senior Researcher, Vegetable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea
1농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 채소기초기반과 박사후연구원
2농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 채소기초기반과 농업연구사
3농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 채소기초기반과 농업연구관
*Corresponding Author
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
31 October 2025. pp. 458-475
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This study aimed to develop drought tolerance indicators in kimchi cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) seedlings by integrating chlorophyll fluorescence (CF) imaging parameters with morphological and physiological traits during post-drought recovery. Seedlings of two cultivars, ‘Bulam3ho’ and ‘Hwipalam’, were exposed to 5 days of water deficit treatment followed by 12 days re-watering period. Drought stress markedly reduced plant leaf area, plant fresh weight, and leaf water content, while increasing dry matter content. Gas exchange traits, including the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration, and stomatal conductance, declined significantly, whereas the intercellular CO2 concentration increased under drought stress and gradually decreased during the recovery period, indicating a transition from stomatal to non-stomatal limitation of photosynthesis. CF parameters, particularly Fv/Fm and Fv/F0, decreased under drought but gradually recovered upon re-irrigation, which indicated reversible photoinhibition of photosystem II. Following re-irrigation, the two cultivars showed distinct recovery dynamics. ‘Bulam3ho’ recovered more rapidly in terms of growth, development, and photosynthetic activity, whereas ‘Hwipalam’ recovered slowly with greater photochemical stability. These results demonstrate distinct recovery strategies between the two cultivars, reflecting their different physiological responses to drought. Moreover, significant correlations among CF indices, gas exchange traits, and morphological parameters demonstrate that CF imaging parameters serve as reliable and non-destructive indicators of drought response and recovery. These findings highlight the potential of CF-based phenotyping for high-throughput screening and breeding of drought-resilient kimchi cabbage cultivars.

Keywords
abiotic stress
Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis
drought-resilient
phenotyping

본 연구는 배추의 내건성 평가지표 개발을 위해 엽록소 형광 이미지 파라미터, 형태 및 생리적 특성을 활용하여 유묘기 배추의 건조 스트레스 후 회복을 평가하였다. ‘불암3호’와 ‘휘파람’ 두 품종을 이용하여, 5일동안 단수처리 후 재관수 후, 12일간 회복기간을 가졌다. 건조 스트레스는 엽면적, 생체중, 엽수분함량을 감소시켰으나, 건물함량은 증가하였다. 순광합성률, 증산률, 기공전도도는 건조 스트레스에 따라 유의하게 감소하였고, 엽육세포 내의 CO2 농도는 증가한 뒤 회복기에 점차 감소하여, 이는 광합성 제한요인이 기공적 요인(stomatal limitation)에서 비기공적 요인(non-stomatal limitation)으로 전환된 것으로 판단하였다. 엽록소 형광 파라미터 중 Fv/Fm과 Fv/Fo는 건조 스트레스에 따라 감소하였으나, 재관수 후 점차 회복되어 광계II의 가역적 광저해(photoinhibition)를 나타냈다. 회복 양상은 품종 간에 차이를 나타냈고, ‘불암3호’는 생육과 광합성 지표에서 빠른 회복을 보였으며, ‘휘파람’은 회복속도는 느리지만 광화학적 안정성이 더 크게 나타냈다. CF 파라미터는 형태적 및 생리적 특성과 높은 상관관계를 보였고, 건조 스트레스 및 회복 평가에 있어 객관적이고 신뢰할 수 있는 평가지표로서 활용 가능성을 나타냈으며, 이는 고속대량 피노타이핑(High-throughput phenotyping) 기술을 활용한 내건성 품종 선발 및 육성에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

키워드
내건성
배추
비생물적 스트레스
피노타이핑
References
1

Abbas K., J. Li, B. Gong, Y. Lu, X. Wu, G. Lü, and H. Gao 2023, Drought stress tolerance in vegetables: The functional role of structural features, key gene pathways, and exogenous hormones. Int J Mol Sci 24:13876. doi:10.3390/ijms241813876 241813876

10.3390/ijms24181387637762179PMC10530793
2

Ahmad Lone W., N. Majeed, U. Yaqoob, and R. John 2022, Exogenous brassinosteroid and jasmonic acid improve drought tolerance in Brassica rapa L. genotypes by modulating osmolytes, antioxidants and photosynthetic system. Plant Cell Rep 41:603-617. doi:10.1007/s00299-021-02763-9

10.1007/s00299-021-02763-9
3

Antunović Dunić J., S. Mlinarić, I. Pavlović, H. Lepeduš, and B. Salopek-Sondi 2023, Comparative analysis of primary photosynthetic reactions assessed by OJIP kinetics in three brassica crops after drought and recovery. Appl Sci 13:3078. doi:10.3390/app13053078

10.3390/app13053078
4

Arief M.A.A., H. Kim, H. Kurniawan, A.P. Nugroho, T. Kim, and B.K. Cho 2023, Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging for early detection of drought and heat stress in strawberry plants. Plants (Basel) 12:1387. doi:10.3390/plants12061387

10.3390/plants1206138736987075PMC10057166
5

Baker N.R. 2008, Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:89-113. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759

10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759
6

Bartold M., and M. Kluczek 2024, Estimating of chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm for plant stress detection at peatlands under Ramsar Convention with Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Ecol Inform 81:102603. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102603

10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102603
7

Briglia N., K. Williams, D. Wu, Y. Li, S. Tao, F. Corke, G. Montanaro, A. Petrozza, D. Amato, F. Cellini, J.H. Doonan, W. Yang, and V. Nuzzo 2020, Image-based assessment of drought response in grapevines. Front Plant Sci 11:595. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00595

10.3389/fpls.2020.0059532499808PMC7242646
8

Chatterjee A., M. Kumar, S. Adak, N. Dey, and R.K. Kar 2025, Insights into mechanisms, responses, and strategies for alleviating drought stress in rice: A current synopsis. J Crop Health 77:39. doi:10.1007/s10343-024-01103-7

10.1007/s10343-024-01103-7
9

Chauhan J., M.D. Prathibha, P. Singh, P. Choyal, U.N. Mishra, D. Saha, R. Kumar, H. Anuragi, S. Pandey, B. Bose, B. Mehta, P. Dey, K.K. Dwivedi, N.K. Gupta, and R.K. Singhal 2023, Plant photosynthesis under abiotic stresses: Damages, adaptive, and signaling mechanisms. Plant Stress 10:100296. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2023.100296

10.1016/j.stress.2023.100296
10

Chen D., S. Wang, B. Cao, D. Cao, G. Leng, H. Li, L. Yin, L. Shan, and X. Deng 2015, Genotypic variation in growth and physiological response to drought stress and re-watering reveals the critical role of recovery in drought adaptation in maize seedlings. Front Plant Sci 2015:1241. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.01241

10.3389/fpls.2015.0124126793218PMC4709455
11

Chen L., C. Li, J. Zhang, Z. Li, Q. Zeng, Q. Sun, X. Wang, L. Zhao, L. Zhang, and B. Li 2024, Physiological and transcriptome analyses of Chinese cabbage in response to drought stress. J Integr Agric 23:2255-2269. doi:10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.067

10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.067
12

Chen L., Y. Shen, W. Yang, Q. Pan, C. Li, Q. Sun, Q. Zeng, B. Li, and L. Zhang 2022, Comparative metabolic study of two contrasting Chinese cabbage genotypes under mild and severe drought stress. Int J Mol Sci 23:5947. doi:10.3390/ijms23115947

10.3390/ijms2311594735682623PMC9180449
13

Chevilly S., L. Dolz-Edo, J.M. López-Nicolás, L. Morcillo, A. Vilagrosa, L. Yenush, and J.M. Mulet 2021, Physiological and molecular characterization of the differential response of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) cultivars reveals limiting factors for broccoli tolerance to drought stress. J Agric Food Chem 69:10394-10404. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03421. 1c03421

10.1021/acs.jafc.1c0342134445860PMC8528380
14

Ejaz I., W. Li, M.A. Naseer, Y. Li, W. Qin, M. Farooq, F. Li, S. Huang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Sun, and K. Yu 2023, Detection of combined frost and drought stress in wheat using hyperspectral and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Environ Technol Innov 30:103051. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2023.103051

10.1016/j.eti.2023.103051
15

Eom S.H., S.A. Baek, J.K. Kim, and T.K. Hyun 2018, Transcriptome analysis in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) provides the role of glucosinolate metabolism in response to drought stress. Molecules 23:1186. doi:10.3390/molecules23051186

10.3390/molecules2305118629762546PMC6099646
16

Flexas J., and H. Medrano 2002, Drought‐inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89:183-189. doi:10.1093/aob/mcf027

10.1093/aob/mcf02712099349PMC4233792
17

Guadagno C.R., B.E. Ewers, H.N. Speckman, T.L. Aston, B.J. Huhn, S.B. DeVore, J.T. Ladwig, R.N. Strawn, and C. Weinig 2017, Dead or alive? using membrane failure and chlorophyll a fluorescence to predict plant mortality from drought. Plant Physiol 175:223-234. doi:10.1104/pp.16.00581

10.1104/pp.16.0058128710130PMC5580738
18

Guo C., L. Liu, H. Sun, N. Wang, K. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, A. Li, Z. Bai, X. Liu, H. Dong, and C. Li 2022, Predicting Fv/Fm and evaluating cotton drought tolerance using hyperspectral and 1D-CNN. Front Plant Sci 13:1007150. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1007150

10.3389/fpls.2022.100715036330250PMC9623111
19

Haghpanah M., S. Hashemipetroudi, A. Arzani, and F. Araniti 2024, Drought tolerance in plants: Physiological and molecular responses. Plants (Basel) 13:2962. doi:10.3390/plants13212962

10.3390/plants1321296239519881PMC11548289
20

Hunt R. 1978, Plant growth analysis. Edward Arnold, London, England.

21

Illouz-Eliaz N., J. Yu, J. Swift, K. Lande, B. Jow, Z.K. Tuang, T. Lee, A. Yaaran, R.G. Castanon, J.R. Nery, T. Nobori, Y. Zait, S. Burdman, and J.R. Ecker 2024, Stress recovery triggers rapid transcriptional reprogramming and activation of immunity in plants. bioRxiv 2023:2023-02. doi:10.1101/2023.02.27.530256

10.1101/2023.02.27.530256
22

Issarakraisila M., Q. Ma, and D.W. Turner 2007, Photosynthetic and growth responses of juvenile Chinese kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) and Caisin (Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis) to waterlogging and water deficit. Sci Hortic 111:107-113. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2006.10.017

10.1016/j.scienta.2006.10.017
23

Jamieson P.D., I.R. Brooking, J.R. Porter, and D.R. Wilson 1995, Prediction of leaf appearance in wheat: A question of temperature. Field Crops Res 41:35-44. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)00102-I

10.1016/0378-4290(94)00102-I
24

Jang Y., J. Kim, J. Lee, S. Lee, H. Jung, and G.H. Park 2024, Drought tolerance evaluation and growth response of Chinese cabbage seedlings to water deficit treatment. Agronomy 14:279. doi:10.3390/agronomy14020279

10.3390/agronomy14020279
25

Jeong M., I.K. Kang, C.K. Kim, K.I. Park, C. Choi, and J.S. Han 2013, Physiological responses to drought stress of transgenic Chinese cabbage expressing Arabidopsis H+-pyrophosphatase (in Korea). J Plant Biotechnol 40:156-162. doi:10.5010/JPB.2013.40.3.156

10.5010/JPB.2013.40.3.156
26

Jumrani K., and V.S. Bhatia 2019, Interactive effect of temperature and water stress on physiological and biochemical processes in soybean. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 25:667-681. doi:10.1007/s12298-019-00657-5

10.1007/s12298-019-00657-531168231PMC6522612
27

Kaur H., S.K. Kohli, K. Khanna, and R. Bhardwaj 2021, Scrutinizing the impact of water deficit in plants: Transcriptional regulation, signaling, photosynthetic efficacy, and management. Physiol Plant 172:935-962. doi:10.1111/ppl.13389

10.1111/ppl.13389
28

Ke X., J. Yao, Z. Jiang, X. Gu, and P. Xu 2025, Recover and surpass: The mechanisms of plants transition upon rehydration from drought. Plant Stress 15:100782. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2025.100782

10.1016/j.stress.2025.100782
29

Kilpeläinen J., P.J. Aphalo, A. Barbero-López, B. Adamczyk, S.A. Nipu, and T. Lehto 2020, Are arbuscular-mycorrhizal Alnus incana seedlings more resistant to drought than ectomycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal ones? Tree Physiol 40:782-795. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpaa035

10.1093/treephys/tpaa035
30

La V.H., B.R. Lee, Q. Zhang, S.H. Park, M.T. Islam, and T.H. Kim 2019, Salicylic acid improves drought-stress tolerance by regulating the redox status and proline metabolism in Brassica rapa. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 60:31-40. doi:10.1007/s13580-018-0099-7

10.1007/s13580-018-0099-7
31

Lee J., J. Kim, S. Lee, G.H. Park, and Y. Jang 2024, Assessment of drought response in Kimchi cabbage, radish, and lettuce seedlings using RGB image analysis. J Bio-Env Con 33:189-199. doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2024.33.4.189

10.12791/KSBEC.2024.33.4.189
32

Lee N.H., W. Jeong, J.Y. Jung, J. Han, M. Baek, M. Son, J.H. Byeon, E.T. Hwang, and K.H. Kim 2025, Effect of abiotic stresses on Brassica rapa production in Korea: Learning from history to better prepare for the future impacts of climate change. Agric Syst 228:104374. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104374

10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104374
33

Levitt J. 1986, Recovery of turgor by wilted, excised cabbage leaves in the absence of water uptake : A new factor in drought acclimation. Plant physiol 82:147-153. doi:10.1104/pp.82.1.147

10.1104/pp.82.1.14716664982PMC1056081
34

Li J., K. Abbas, W. Wang, B. Gong, L. Wang, S. Hou, H. Xia, X. Wu, L. Chen, and H. Gao 2023, Drought tolerance evaluation and verification of fifty pakchoi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis) varieties under water deficit condition. Agronomy 13:2087. doi:10.3390/agronomy13082087

10.3390/agronomy13082087
35

Li Z., Z. Liu, J. Zhu, W. Wang, C. Gao, J. Qi, X. Qiu, M. Bao, H. Luo, Y. Li, and Y. Liu 2025, Drought-rewatering dynamics in Chinese cropping systems: A meta-analysis of yield loss mitigation, water use efficiency, and compensatory physiological response. Agronomy 15:911. doi:10.3390/agronomy15040911

10.3390/agronomy15040911
36

Lin S.Y., P.A. Chen, and B.W. Zhuang 2022, The stomatal conductance and Fv/Fm as the indicators of stress tolerance of avocado seedlings under short-term waterlogging. Agronomy 12:1084. doi:10.3390/agronomy12051084

10.3390/agronomy12051084
37

Maxwell K., and G.N. Johnson 2000, Chlorophyll fluorescence-A practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659-668. doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659

10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
38

Medyouni I., R. Zouaoui, E. Rubio, S. Serino, H.B. Ahmed, and N. Bertin 2021, Effects of water deficit on leaves and fruit quality during the development period in tomato plant. Food Sci Nutr 9:1949-1960. doi:10.1002/fsn3.2160

10.1002/fsn3.216033841813PMC8020918
39

Mohan V.R., M.T. MacDonald, and L. Abbey 2025, Impact of water deficit stress on brassica crops: growth and yield, physiological and biochemical responses. Plants (Basel) 14:1942. doi:10.3390/plants14131942

10.3390/plants1413194240647951PMC12252070
40

Murchie E.H., and T. Lawson 2013, Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot 64:3983-3998. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert208

10.1093/jxb/ert208
41

Okami M., Y. Kato, N. Kobayashi, and J. Yamagishi 2015, Morphological traits associated with vegetative growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during the recovery phase after early-season drought. Eur J Agron 64:58-66. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2014.12.006

10.1016/j.eja.2014.12.006
42

Orka N.A., F.M. Toushique, M.N. Uddin, and M.L. Bari 2023, Application of computer vision in assessing crop abiotic stress: A systematic review. PLOS ONE 18:e0290383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290383

10.1371/journal.pone.029038337611022PMC10446212
43

Patra J.K., G. Das, S. Paramithiotis, H.S. Shin 2016, Kimchi and other widely consumed traditional fermented foods of Korea: A review. Front Microbiol 7:1493. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01493

10.3389/fmicb.2016.0149327733844PMC5039233
44

Pérez-Patricio M., J.A. de Jesús Osuna-Coutiño, G. Ríos-Toledo, A. Aguilar-González, J.L. Camas-Anzueto, N.A. Morales-Navarro, J.R. Velázquez-González, and L.Á. Cundapí-López 2024, Plant stress detection using a three- dimensional analysis from a single RGB image. Sensors (Basel) 24:7860 doi:10.3390/s24237860

10.3390/s2423786039686397PMC11645006
45

Rabha B.K., and D.C. Uprety 1998, Effects of Elevated CO2 and moisture stress on Brassica juncea. Photosynthetica 35:597-602. doi:10.1023/A:1006991210089

10.1023/A:1006991210089
46

Seleiman M.F., N. Al-Suhaibani, N. Ali, M. Akmal, M. Alotaibi, Y. Refay, T. Dindaroglu, H.H. Abdul-Wajid, and M.L. Battaglia 2021, Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants (Basel) 10:259. doi:10.3390/plants10020259

10.3390/plants1002025933525688PMC7911879
47

Shawon R.A., B.S. Kang, H.C. Kim, S.G. Lee, S.K. Kim, H.J. Lee, J.H. Bae, and Y.G. Ku 2018, Changes in free amino acid, carotenoid, and proline content in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) in response to drought stress. Korean J Plant Res 31:622-633. doi:10.7732/kjpr.2018.31.6.622

10.7732/kjpr.2018.31.6.622
48

Shin Y.K., S.R. Bhandari, M.C. Cho, and J.G. Lee 2020, Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and proline content in tomato seedlings grown under different salt stress conditions. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 61:433-443. doi:10.1007/s13580-020-00231-z

10.1007/s13580-020-00231-z
49

Shin Y.K., S.R. Bhandari, J.S. Jo, Song J.W. Jo, and J.G. Lee 2021, Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant activities in lettuce seedlings. Horticulturae 7:238. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7080238

10.3390/horticulturae7080238
50

Shin Y.K., Y.H. Kim, and J.G. Lee 2019, Application of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters for the detection of water stress ranges in grafted watermelon seedlings (In Korea). J Bio-Env Con 28:461-470. doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.4.461

10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.4.461
51

Singh M., J. Chauhan, and S. Meena 2009, Drought induce changes in water use efficiency and other morphophysiological characters in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). 16th Australian Research Assembly on Brassicas, Ballarat Victoria:1-5.

52

Taiz L., I.M. Møller, A.S. Murphy, and E. Zeiger 2023, Plant physiology and development. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/hesc/9780197614204.001.0001

10.1093/hesc/9780197614204.001.0001
53

Wang R., N. He, S. Li, L. Xu, and M. Li 2021, Spatial variation and mechanisms of leaf water content in grassland plants at the biome scale: Evidence from three comparative transects. Sci Rep 11:9281. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88678-7

10.1038/s41598-021-88678-733927280PMC8084930
54

Weisz P.R., H.C. Randall, and T.R. Sinclair 1989, Water relations of turgor recovery and restiffening of wilted cabbage leaves in the absence of water uptake. Plant physiol 91:433-439. doi:10.1104/pp.91.1.433

10.1104/pp.91.1.43316667038PMC1062011
55

Wi S.H., H.J. Lee, S. An, and S.K. Kim 2020, Evaluating growth and photosynthesis of Kimchi cabbage according to extreme weather conditions. Agronomy 10:1846. doi:10.3390/agronomy10121846

10.3390/agronomy10121846
56

Wu H., X. Wu, Z. Li, L. Duan, and M. Zhang 2012, Physiological evaluation of drought stress tolerance and recovery in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) seedlings treated with methyl jasmonate and coronatine. J Plant Growth Regul 31:113-123. doi:10.1007/s00344-011-9224-x

10.1007/s00344-011-9224-x
57

Yang X., M. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, and S. Chen 2021, Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae 7:50. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7030050

10.3390/horticulturae7030050
58

Yao J., D. Sun, H. Cen, H. Xu, H. Weng, F. Yuan, and Y. He 2018, Phenotyping of Arabidopsis drought stress response using kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence and multicolor fluorescence imaging. Front Plant Sci 9:00603. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00603

10.3389/fpls.2018.0060329868063PMC5958224
59

Ye D., L. Wu, X. Li, T.O. Atoba, W. Wu, and H. Weng 2023, A synthetic review of various dimensions of non-destructive plant stress phenotyping. Plants (Basel) 12:1698. doi:10.3390/plants12081698

10.3390/plants1208169837111921PMC10146287
60

Zait Y., O.E. Shemer, and A. Cochavi 2024, Dynamic responses of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to drought across diverse plant families. Physiol Plant 176:e14527. doi:10.1111/ppl.14527

10.1111/ppl.14527
61

Zhang Y., Y. Shi, H.J. Gong, H.L. Zhao, H.L. Li, Y.H. Hu, and Y.C. Wang 2018, Beneficial effects of silicon on photosynthesis of tomato seedlings under water stress. J Integr Agric 17:2151-2159. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62038-6

10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62038-6
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Bio-Environment Control
  • Journal Title(Ko) :생물환경조절학회지
  • Volume : 34
  • No :4
  • Pages :458-475
  • Received Date : 2025-09-11
  • Revised Date : 2025-10-14
  • Accepted Date : 2025-10-20
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2025.34.4.458
Journal Informaiton Journal of Bio-Environment Control Journal of Bio-Environment Control
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close