All Issue

2021 Vol.30, Issue 1 Preview Page

Original Articles

Effect of Irrigation Starting Point of Soil on Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Stem Sap Flux Relative Rate and Leaf Temperature of Cucumber in Greenhouse

시설 토양 오이재배에서 관수개시점 처리가 광합성 형광반응, 줄기수액흐름 및 엽온에 미치는 영향

Jin Hee An1
,
Sang Ho Jeon2
,
Eun Yong Choi3
,
Ho Min Kang4
,
Jong Kuk Na5
,
Ki Young Choi5†
안 진희1
,
전 상호2
,
최 은영3
,
강 호민4
,
나 종국5
,
최 기영5†
1Graduate Student, Department of Agriculture and Industries, Kangwon National University Graduate School, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2Researcher, Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea
3Professor, Department of Agricultural Science, Korea National Open University, Seoul 03087, Korea
4Professor, Department of Horitculture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
5Professor, Division of Future Agriculture Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
1강원대학교 농산업학과 대학원생
2국립농업과학원 토양 비료과 연구사
3한국방송통신대학교 농학과 교수
4강원대학교 원예학과 교수
5강원대학교 미래농업융합학부 교수
*choiky@kangwon.ac.kr
31 January 2021. pp. 46-55
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect on chlorophyll fluorescence, stem sap flux relative rate (SFRR) and leaf temperature of cucumber when irrigation is controlled using a soil moisture tensiometer. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) ‘Chungchun’ was irrigated of 10-10-20 kPa and 20-10-10 kPa by soil starting point of irrigation at each growth stage. At the 66 days after treatment (DAT) of 736 to 854 W·m-2 and above 32°C, chlorophyll fluorescence variables (Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm) values showed significantly different between treatments. The Fo and Fv/Fm value in the daytime (10:30 am to 6:00 pm) at 66 DAT was higher in 20-10-10 kPa treatment than in 10-10-20 kPa treatment. The Fv/Fm value decreased when the leaf temperature was increased. There was no difference in leaf growth (length, width and area) at 28 and 66 DAT, but the chlorophyll content (SPAD value) was significantly higher in 20-10-10kPa treatment. SFRR and leaf temperature increased with light intensity and temperature increased. In both treatments, the SFRR started to increase sharply between 8 am and 9 am when the solar radiation is 170 W·m-2 or higher. The soil temperature of the treatments decreased after irrigation, that showed 31.0°C at 10-10-20kPa and 28.5°C at 20-10-10kPa on July 5 (820W·m-2 at 1 pm). However, there was no difference in SFRR, leaf temperature, temperature difference (leaf temperature - air temperature) and VPD between treatments. SFRR was significantly positive correlate with the leaf temperature (p < 0.01, r = 0.770). The SFRR and leaf temperature showed positive significant correlation with solar radiation, temperature, soil temperature, soil moisture content and VPD. There was a negative significant correlation with relative humidity and temperature difference.

Keywords
Fv/Fm
soil temperature
SPAD value
temperature difference
VPD

시설 토양 오이재배에서 토양수분장력계를 이용하여 관수 제어하였을 때 오이의 광합성 형광반응, 수액 흐름, 엽온 등에 미치는 영향을 구명하고자 실험을 수행하였다. 오이(Cucumis sativus L.)‘청춘’(해오름 종묘)을 공시하여 관수개시점 10- 10-20kPa 또는 20-10-10kPa의 2처리하였다. 766 ~ 854 W·m-2의 고광, 32°C 이상의 고온인 처리 66일 째 광합성형광반응변수(Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm)값은 처리 간 차이가 컸다. 66일 째 낮 시간(오전 10시 반 ~ 오후 6시)의 Fo와 Fv/Fm값은 10-10-20kPa 처리보다 20-10-10kPa 처리에서 높았다. 엽온이 높았을 때 Fv/Fm값은 감소하였다. 28일과 66일째 엽 생육(엽장, 엽폭, 엽면적)은 차이가 없었으나 엽록소 함량(SPAD 값)은 20-10- 10kPa 처리에서 유의하게 높았다. 광도와 온도가 증가함에 따라 줄기수액흐름상대율(SFRR)과 엽온은 상승하였다. 두 처리구 모두 SFRR은 광도 170 W·m-2 이상인 오전 8시 ~ 9시간대에 급격한 증가가 시작되었다. 관수 후의 처리구 토양 온도는 감소하였으나, 7월 5일(광도 820W·m-2, 오후 1시) 토양 온도가 10-10-20kPa에서는 31.0°C, 20-10-10kPa에서는 28.5°C였다. 그러나 처리 간 SFRR, 엽온, 기온차, VPD는 차이가 없었다. SFRR과 엽온 간에는 정의 상관성(p < 0.01, r = 0.770)을 보였으며, SFRR과 엽온은 광, 온도, 토양 온도, 토양수분함량, VPD 간에는 정의 상관을 상대습도와 기온차 간에는 부의 상관을 보였다.

키워드
Fv/Fm
SPAD 값
토양 온도
기온차
VPD
References
1
An J.H., S.H. Jeon, M.H. Lee, D.C. Jang, E.Y. Choi, J.K. Na, and K.Y. Choi. 2021. Effect of irrigation starting point of soil using tensiometer on growth and water use of cucumber in greenhouse. J. Korea Soc. Hort. Sci (in pressing, in Korean).
2
Anjum S.A., X.Y. Xie, L.C. Wang, M.F. Saleem, C. Man, and W. Lei. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African J. of agricultural research 6:2026-2032.
3
Bhandari S.R., Y.H. Kim, and J.G. Lee. 2018. Detection of temperature stress using chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and stress-related chlorophyll and proline content in paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) seedlings. Hort. Sci. & Tech. 36: 619-629. 10.12972/kjhst.20180062
4
Chen L.S. and L. Cheng. 2009. Photosystem 2 is more tolerant to high temperature in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) leaves than in fruit peel. Photosynthetica 47:112-120. 10.1007/s11099-009-0017-4
5
Choi E.Y., K.Y. Choi, and Y.B. Lee. 2013. Scheduling non- drainage irrigation in coir substrate hydroponics with different percentages of chips and dust for tomato cultivation using a frequency domain reflectometry Sensor. protected Hort. and Plant Factory 22:248-255. 10.12791/KSBEC.2013.22.3.248
6
Idso, S.B. 1982. Non-water-stressed baselines: a key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress. Agricultural Meteorology 27:59-70. 10.1016/0002-1571(82)90020-6
7
Jackson R.D., S.B.Idso, R.J. Reginato, and P.J. Pinter. 1981. Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resour. Res. 17:1133-1138. 10.1029/WR017i004p01133
8
Jeon S.H., S.O. Hur, S.K. Ha, H.J. Jun, K.H. Han, H.R. Cho, and S.D. Hong. 2010. Water saving irrigation point in cucumber cultivation under greenhouse. Korean J Soil Sci. Fert. 43:540-545 (in Korean).
9
Jones H.G. 2004. Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of experimental botany 55:2427-2436. 10.1093/jxb/erh21315286143
10
Kang Y.I., N.J. Kang, M.W. Cho, S.Y. Lee, G.C. Kang, and J.K. Kwon. 2009. Effect of daily weather and soil EC on chlorophyll fluorescence of tomato during high temperature season. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 27.
11
Kim D.E., J.K. Kwon, S.J. Hong, J.W. Lee, and Y.H. Woo. 2020. The effect of greenhouse climate change by temporary shading at summer on photo respiration, leaf temperature and growth of cucumber. protected Hort. and Plant Factory 29:306-312 (in Korean). 10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.3.306
12
Kim H.G., J.S. Lee, and Y.H. Kim. 2018. Chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll content, graft-taking, and growth of grafted cucumber seedlings affected by photosynthetic photon flux of LED lamps. Protected Hort and Plant Factory 27:231-238 (in Korean). 10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.3.231
13
Kim H.J., M.Y. Roh, D.H. Lee, S.H. Jeon, S.O. Hur, J.Y. Choi, S.O. Chung, and J.Y. Rhee. 2011. Feasibility test on automatic control of soil water potential using a portable irrigation controller with an electrical resistance-based watermark sensor. J. Bio-Environment Control 20:93-100 (in Korean).
14
Kim S.K., H.J. Lee, H.S. Lee, B.H. Mun, and S.G. Lee. 2017. Effect of soil water content on growth, photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance of Kimchi cabbage at the early growth stage after transplanting. Protected Hort. and Plant Factory 26:151-157 (in Korean). 10.12791/KSBEC.2017.26.3.151
15
Lee S.H., G.C. Chung, and S.R. Suh. 1998. Effect of light intensity on the leaf temperature, chlorophyll fluorescence, transpiration and leaf area index in cucumber plants. Kor J. Hort. Sci. & Tech.16:97-97 (in Korean).
16
MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2020 Vegetable greenhouse Status and vegetable production.
17
Maxwell K. and G.N. Johnson. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. Journal of experimental botany 51: 659-668. 10.1093/jxb/51.345.65910938857
18
Moon W. and D.J. Yu. 2013. Plant physiology. KNOU Press. ISBN 978-89-20-01122-1 93520.
19
Oh S.J., K.H. Moon, I.C. Son, E.Y. Song, Y.E. Moon, and S.C. Koh. 2014. Growth, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of chinese cabbage in response to high temperature. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 32:318-329 (in Korean). 10.7235/hort.2014.13174
20
Oletic D. and V. Bilas. 2020. How thirsty the crops are: Emerging instrumentation for plant-based field measurement of water stress. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 23:37-46. 10.1109/MIM.2020.9062686
21
Park Y.M. 2011. Leaf temperature characteristics being affected by light regimes. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 20:1599-1605. 10.5322/JES.2011.20.12.1599
22
RDA. 2018. Cucumber- Agricultural technology guide 107. RDA, Korea. p. 24-25, 91.
23
RDA. 2020. Agricultural and livestock income databook. ISBN 978-89-480-6452-0 93520.
24
Rhee H.C., G.L. Choi, J.W. Jeong, M.H. Cho, K.H. Yeo, D.M. Kim, C.G. An, and D.Y. Lee. 2013. Effect of soil water potential on the fruit quality and yield in fertigation cultivation of paprika in summer. Protected Hort Plant Fac. 22:378-384 (in Korean). 10.12791/KSBEC.2013.22.4.378
25
Seo Y.J., B.S. Kim, J.P. Lee, J.S. Kim, K.C. Park, C.G. Park, and S.W. Cha. 2015. Effects of soil water potential and nitrogen fertilization on characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence induction in schisandra chinensis baillon. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 48:705-711 (in Korean). 10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.6.705
26
Thompson R.B., M. Gallardo, T. Agüera, L.C. Valdez, and M.D. 2006. Evaluation of the watermark sensor for use with drip irrigated vegetable crops. Irrigation Science 24:185-202. 10.1007/s00271-005-0009-5
27
Woo Y.H., H.J. Kim, Y.I. Nam, I.M. Cho, and Y.S. Kwon. 2000. Predicting and measuring transpiration based on phytomonitoring of tomato in greenhouse. J. Korea Soc. Hort. Sci. 41:459-463 (in Korean).
28
Yoon B.H., E.K. Cho, J.H. Baek, I.H. Cho, Y.H. Woo, and E.Y. Choi. 2020. Comparison of irrigation and drainage volumes, growth and fruit yield under different automated irrigation methods in tomato rockwool hydroponics. Protected Hort and Plant Factory 29:28-35 (in Korean). 10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.1.28
29
Yun S.K., S.J. Kim, E.T. Nam, J.H. Kwon, Y.S. Do, S.Y. Song, M.Y. Kim, Y.H. Choi, G.S. Kim, and H.S. Shin. 2020. Evaluation of water stress using canopy temperature and crop water stress index (CWSI) in peach trees. Protected Hort. and Plant Factory 29:20-27. 10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.1.20
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Bio-Environment Control
  • Journal Title(Ko) :생물환경조절학회지
  • Volume : 30
  • No :1
  • Pages :46-55
  • Received Date : 2021-01-11
  • Revised Date : 2021-01-18
  • Accepted Date : 2021-01-19
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2021.30.1.046
Journal Informaiton Journal of Bio-Environment Control Journal of Bio-Environment Control
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close