All Issue

2022 Vol.31, Issue 3 Preview Page

Original Articles

Growth Characteristics of Tomatoes Grafted with Different Rootstocks Grown in Soil during Winter Season

대목 종류에 따른 저온기 토경재배에서의 토마토 생육 특성 분석

Hyewon Lee12
,
Jun Gu Lee3
,
Myeong Cheoul Cho4
,
Indeok Hwang5
,
Kue Hyon Hong6
,
Deok Ho Kwon6
,
Yul Kyun Ahn6*
이 혜원12
,
이 준구3
,
조 명철4
,
황 인덕5
,
홍 규현6
,
권 덕호6
,
안 율균6*
1Researcher, Department of Vegetable crops, Korea National University of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea
2Graduate Student, Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
3Professor, Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
4Research Officer, Vegetable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea
5R&D Director, R&D Center, Bunongseed Co., Ltd., Gimje 54324, Korea
6Professor, Department of Vegetable crops, Korea National University of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea
1국립한국농수산대학교 채소학과 연구원
2전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과 대학원생
3전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과 교수
4농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 채소과 연구관
5부농종묘 육종연구소 소장
6국립한국농수산대학교 채소학과 교수
*Corresponding Author
31 July 2022. pp. 194-203
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Cultivation of tomatoes in Korea grown in soil covers 89% of the total area for tomato cultivation. Tomatoes grown in soil often encounter various environment stresses including not only salt stress and soil-borne diseases but also cold stress in the winter season. This study was conducted to comparatively analyze the performance of rootstocks with cold stress by measuring the growth, yield, and photosynthetic efficiency in tomatoes grown in soil. The rootstocks were used ‘Powerguard’, ‘IT173773’, and ‘20LM’ for the domestic rootstock cultivars and ‘B-blocking’ for a control cultivar. The tomato cultivar ‘Red250’ was used as the scion and the non-grafted tomatoes. Stem diameter, flowering position, leaf length, and leaf width were investigated for the growth parameters. The stem diameter of the non-grafted tomatoes decreased by 15% compared to the grafted tomatoes at 80 days after transplanting when exposed to low temperatures of 9－14°C for 14 days. The leaf length and width of the non-grafted tomatoes were the lowest with 42.4 cm and 41.8 cm at 80 days after transplanting. The total yield per plant was the highest in tomato plants grafted on ‘Powerguard’ with 1,615 g and lowest in non-grafted tomatoes with 1,299 g. As the result of measuring the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, PIABS and DI0/RC, which mean the performance index and dissipated energy flux, ‘Powerguard’ was the highest with 3.73 in PIABS and the lowest with 0.34 in DI0/RC, whereas non-grafted tomatoes was the lowest with 2.62 in PIABS and the highest with 0.41 in DI0/RC at 80 days after transplanting. The stem diameter has positive correlation with PIABS, while it has negative correlation with DI0/RC. The results indicate that can be analyzed by chlorophyll fluorescence parameters can be used for analyzing the differences in the growth of tomato plants grafted on different rootstocks when exposed to cold stress.

Keywords
chlorophyll fluorescence
cold stress
stem diameter
plant vigor
Solanum lycopersicum L.

국내 토마토 토경재배 면적은 전체 재배면적의 89%로 높은 비율을 차지하고 있다. 토경재배 토마토는 염류장해와 토양전염성 병원균 피해에 취약할 뿐만 아니라 겨울철 저온 피해를 입기 쉽기 때문에 토마토 접목묘를 사용하는 것이 좋다. 본 연구는 저온기 토경재배에서의 토마토 대목의 종류에 따라 나타나는 생육, 수량 및 광합성 효율의 차이를 비교 분석하고자 수행하였다. 대목의 종류는 4가지로 국내 개발 계통 및 품종 ‘Powergaurd’, ‘IT173773’, ‘20LM’과 대조 품종 ‘B-blocking’을 사용하였다. 접수와 비접목 처리구로 완숙토마토 품종 ‘Red250’을 사용하였다. 작물이 14일간 9－14℃의 저온에 노출된 시기인 정식 후 80일에 비접목 처리구의 경경은 10.1mm로 접목 처리구에 비해 15% 낮았고 엽장과 엽폭은 42.4cm와 41.8cm로 감소하였다. 주당 총 수량은 ‘Powerguard’가 1,615g으로 높았고 비접목 처리구가 1,299g으로 낮았다. 엽록소형광 지수 중 작물의 전반적인 활력도를 나타내는 PIABS와 광합성에 사용되지 못한 빛에너지가 열로 소실됨을 뜻하는 지수인 DI0/RC를 측정한 결과, 정식 후 80일에 접목 처리구 ‘Powerguard’의 PIABS는 3.73으로 높았고 DI0/RC는 0.34로 낮은 반면, 비접목 처리구의 PIABS는 2.62로 낮았고 DI0/RC는 0.41로 높았다. 경경은 PIABS와 정의 상관관계를 나타낸 반면, DI0/RC와는 부의 상관관계를 나타내어 다양한 엽록소형광 지수를 통해 저온기 대목 종류에 따른 접수의 생육 차이를 분석할 수 있는 것으로 판단된다.

키워드
Solanum lycopersicum L.
경경
엽록소형광
작물 세력
저온 스트레스
References
1
Aazami M.A., M. Asghari-Aruq, M.B. Hassanpouraghdam, S. Ercisli, M. Baron, and J. Sochor 2021, Low temperature stress mediates the antioxidants pool and chlorophyll fluorescence in Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Plants 10:1877. doi:10.3390/plants10091877 10.3390/plants1009187734579411PMC8470009
2
Ajigboye O.O., L. Bousquet, E.H. Murchie, and R.V. Ray 2016, Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters allow the rapid detection and differentiation of plant responses in three different wheat pathosystems. Funct Plant Biol 43:356-369. doi:10.1071/FP15280 10.1071/FP1528032480467
3
Baghbani F., R. Lotfi, S. Moharramnejad, A. Bandehagh, M. Roostaei, A. Rastogi, and H.M. Kalaji 2019, Impact of Fusarium verticillioides on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of two maize lines. Eur J Plant Pathol 154:337-346. doi:10.1007/s10658-018-01659-x 10.1007/s10658-018-01659-x
4
Baker N.R., and E. Rosenqvist 2004, Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot 55:1607-1621. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh196 10.1093/jxb/erh19615258166
5
Bristow S.T., L.H. Hernandez-Espinoza, M. Bonarota, and F.H. Barrios-Masias 2021, Tomato rootstocks mediate plant-water relations and leaf nutrient profiles of a common scion under suboptimal soil temperatures. Front Plant Sci 11:618488. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.618488 10.3389/fpls.2020.61848833552111PMC7859091
6
Bussotti F., R. Desotgiu, C. Cascio, M. Pollastrini, E. Gravano, G. Gerosa, R. Marzuoli, C. Nali, G. Lorenzini, E. Salvatori, F. Manes, M. Schaub, and R.J. Strasser 2011, Ozone stress in woody plants assessed with chlorophyll a fluorescence: A critical reassessment of existing data. Environ Exp Bot 73:19-30. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.022 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.022
7
Force L., C. Critchley, and J.J.S. van Rensen 2003, New fluorescence parameters for monitoring photosynthesis in plants. Photosynth Res 78:17-33. doi:10.1023/A:1026012116709 10.1023/A:102601211670916245061
8
Gálvez A., A. Albacete, C. Martínez-Andújar, F.M. Amor, and J. López-Marín 2021, Contrasting rootstock-mediated growth and yield responses in salinized pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) are associated with change in the hormonal balance. Int J Mol Sci 22:3297. doi:10.3390/ijms22073297 10.3390/ijms2207329733804877PMC8037536
9
Govindjee 1995, Sixty-three years since Kautsky: chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:131-160. 10.1071/PP9950131
10
Harel D., H. Fadida, A. Slepoy, S. Gantz, and K. Shilo 2014, The effect of mean daily temperature and relative humidity on pollen, fruit set and yield of tomato grown in commercial protected cultivation. Agronomy 4:167-177. doi:10.3390/agronomy4010167 10.3390/agronomy4010167
11
Healey J.F. 1993, Statics, a tool for social research. Wadsworth Incorporated, Belmont, CA, USA.
12
Kalaji H.M., A. Jajoo, A. Oukarroum, M. Brestic, M. Zivcak, I.A. Samborska, M.D. Cetner, I. Lukasik, V. Goltsev, and R.J. Ladle 2016, Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 38:102. doi:10.1007/s11738-016-2113-y 10.1007/s11738-016-2113-y
13
Kalaji H.M., Govindjee, K. Bosa, J. Koscielniak, and K. Zuk-Golaszewska 2011, Effect of salt stress on photosystem Ⅱ efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Environ Exp Bot 73:64-72. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.009 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.009
14
Kim S.E., S.Y. Sim, S.D. Lee, and Y.S. Kim 2010, Appropriate root-zone temperature control in perlite bag culture of tomato during winter season. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 28:783-789. (in Korean)
15
Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) 2022, MAFRA, https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=114&tblId=DT_114018_005&conn_path=I2, Accessed 10 June 2022. (in Korean)
16
Latifah E., A. Krismawati, M. Saeri, Z. Arifin, B. Warsiati, D. Setyorini, P.E.R. Prahardini, H. Subagio, D. Sihombing, S.S Antarlina, E. Widaryanto, Ariffin, and M.D. Maghfoer 2021, Analysis of plant growth and yield in varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grafted onto different eggplant rootstocks. Hindawi Int J Agron 2021:1-11. doi:10.1155/2021/6630382 10.1155/2021/6630382
17
Lee H., J.G. Lee, K.H. Hong, D.H. Kwon, M.C. Cho, I. Hwang, and Y.K. Ahn 2021, Improving growth and yield in cherry tomato by using rootstocks. J Bio-Env Con 30:196-205. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2021.30.3.196 10.12791/KSBEC.2021.30.3.196
18
Lee H., K.H. Hong, D.H. Kwon, M.C. Cho, J.G. Lee, I. Hwang, and Y.K. Ahn 2020, Changes of growth and yield by using rootstocks in tomato. Protected Hort Plant Fac 29:456-463. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.4.456 10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.4.456
19
Lee J.B., S.C. Koh, B.Y. Moon, I.H. Park, H.B. Park, and H.S. Chun 2016, Plant physiology (Korean edition). Lifescience, Seoul, Korea, pp 126. (in Korean)
20
Lee J.M., and M. Oda 2002, Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Hortic Rev 28:61-124. doi:10.1002/9780470650851.ch2 10.1002/9780470650851.ch2
21
Leonardi C., and F. Giuffrida 2006, Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocks. Eur J Hortic Sci 71:97-101.
22
Ntatsi G., D. Savvas, V. Papasotiropoulos, A. Katsileros, R.M. Zrenner, D.K. Hincha, E. Zuther, and D. Schwarz 2017, Rootstock sub-optimal temperature tolerance determines transcriptomic responses after long-term root cooling in rootstocks and scions of grafted tomato plants. Front Plant Sci 8:911. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00911 10.3389/fpls.2017.0091128642763PMC5462977
23
Oh S., and S.C. Koh 2005, Analysis of O-J-I-P transients from four subtropical plant species for screening of stress indicators under low temperature. J Environ Sci Int 14:389-395. (in Korean) doi:10.5322/JES.2005.14.4.389 10.5322/JES.2005.14.4.389
24
Ploeg D.V., and E. Heuvelink 2005, Influence of sub-optimal temperature on tomato growth and yield: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80:652-659. doi:10.1080/14620316.2005.11511994 10.1080/14620316.2005.11511994
25
Rural Development Administration (RDA) 2018, Tomato. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea, pp 74-144. (in Korean)
26
Schwarz D., Y. Rouphael, G. Colla, and J.H. Venema 2010, Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: Thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci Hortic 127:162-171. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016
27
Sharma V., P. Kumar, P. Sharma, N.D. Negi, A. Singh, P.K. Sharma, N.S. Dhillon, and B. Vats 2019, Rootstock and scion compatibility studies in tomato under protected conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 8:1188-1197. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.135 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.135
28
Soe D.W., Z.Z. Win, A.A. Thwe, and K.T. Myint 2018, Effect of different rootstocks on plant growth, development and yield of grafted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J Agric Res 5:30-38
29
Stanghellini C., B.V. Ooster, and E. Heuvelink 2019, Greenhouse horticulture technology for optimal crop production. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-879-7 10.3920/978-90-8686-879-7
30
Stradiot P., and P. Battistel 2003, Improved plant management with localized crop heating and advice on distance in the Mediterranean climate. Acta Hortic 614:461-467. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.614.69 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.614.69
31
Suchoff D.H., P. Perkins-Veazie, H.W. Sederoff, J.R. Schultheis, M.D. Kleinhenz, F.J. Louws, and C.C. Gunter 2018, Grafting the indeterminate tomato cultivar Moneymaker onto multifort rootstock improves cold tolerance. HortScience 53:1610-1617. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI13311-18 10.21273/HORTSCI13311-18
32
Thach L.B., A. Shapcott, S. Schmidt, and C. Critchley 2007, The OJIP fast fluorescence rise characterizes Graptophyllum species and their stress response. Photosynth Res 94:423-436. doi:10.1007/s11120-007-9207-8 10.1007/s11120-007-9207-817680343
33
Thimijan R.W., and R.D. Heins 1983, Photometric, radiometric, and quantum light units of measure: a review of procedures for interconversion. HortScience 18:818-822.
34
Thwe A., and P. Kasemsap 2014, Quantification of OJIP fluorescence transient in tomato plants under acute ozone stress. Kasetsart J - Nat Sci 48:665-675.
35
Yang E.Y., S.N. Rajametov, M.C. Cho, H.B. Jeong, and W.B. Chae 2021, Factors affecting tolerance to low night temperature differ by fruit types in tomato. Agriculture 11:681. doi:10.3390/agriculture11070681 10.3390/agriculture11070681
36
Yoo S.Y., Y.H. Lee, S.H. Park, K. Choi, J.Y. Park, A.R. Kim, S.M. Hwang, M.J. Lee, T.S. Ko, and T.W. Kim 2013, Photochemical response analysis on drought stress for red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Korean J Soil Sci Fert 46:659-664. (in Korean) doi:10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.6.659 10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.6.659
37
Zhang L., G. Zhang, H. Li, and G. Sun 2014, Eco-physiological responses of Scirpus planiculmis to different water-salt conditions in Momoge Wetland. Pol J Envion Stud 23:1813-1820.
38
Živčák M., M. Brestič, K. Olšovská, and P. Slamka 2008, Performance index as a sensitive indicator of water stress in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Soil Environ 54:133-139. doi:10.17221/392-PSE 10.17221/392-PSE
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Bio-Environment Control
  • Journal Title(Ko) :생물환경조절학회지
  • Volume : 31
  • No :3
  • Pages :194-203
  • Received Date : 2022-06-23
  • Revised Date : 2022-07-15
  • Accepted Date : 2022-07-15
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2022.31.3.194
Journal Informaiton Journal of Bio-Environment Control Journal of Bio-Environment Control
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close