All Issue

2021 Vol.30, Issue 3 Preview Page

Original Articles

Effect of Stem Number on Growth, Fruit Quality, and Yield of Sweet Peppers Grown in Greenhouses under Supplemental Lighting with High Pressure Sodium Lamps in Winter

겨울철 고압나트륨등 보광 하에서 온실재배 파프리카의 줄기 유인 수가 생육, 과실 품질 및 생산량에 미치는 영향

Seungri Yoon1†
,
Jin Hyun Kim2†
,
Inha Hwang1
,
Dongpil Kim1
,
Jiyong Shin1
,
Jung Eek Son34*
윤 승리1†
,
김 진현2†
,
황 인하1
,
김 동필1
,
신 지용1
,
손 정익34*
1Graduate Student, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources (Horticultural Science and Biotechnology), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2Researcher, Protected Horticulture Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Haman 52054, Korea
3Professor, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources (Horticultural Science and Biotechnology), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
4Adjunct Senior Researcher, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
1서울대학교 농림생물자원학부 원예생명공학전공 대학원생
2농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 시설원예연구소 연구사
3서울대학교 농림생물자원학부 원예생명공학전공 교수
4서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원 겸임연구원
*Corresponding Author
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
31 July 2021. pp. 237-243
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of stem number on plant growth, fruit quality, and yield of sweet peppers grown in greenhouses under supplemental lighting in winter. The seedlings were transplanted at 3.2 plants·m-2 on October 26, 2020, and started supplemental lighting with 32 high pressure sodium lamps for 16-hour photoperiod from December 1, 2020 to May 25, 2021. Stems were differently trained with 2 and 3 numbers after branching nodes were developed. In the final harvest, the plant height was significantly shorter in the 3 stem-plants than in the 2 stem-plants. The number of nodes per stem and the leaves per plant were increased in the 3 stem-plants than in the 2 stem-plants, while the leaf area was less affected. There were no significant differences in the dry mass of leaves, stems, and immature fruits between the 2 and 3 stem-plants. The fruit fresh weight and fruit dry weight in the 3 stem-plants were decreased by 17% and 12% at 156 days after transplanting (DAT), and by 17% and 15% at 198 DAT compared to those in the 2 stem-plants, respectively. The marketable fruit rates were 93.6% and 95.4% in the 2 and 3 stem-plants, respectively. The total fruit yield in the 3 stem-plants was increased by 30.2% as compared to that in the 2 stem-plants. We concluded that the 3-stem-training cultivation positively affected the total fruit yield by sustaining adaptive vegetative growth of the plants. This result will help producers make useful decisions for increasing productivity of sweet peppers in greenhouses.

Keywords
artificial lighting
paprika
productivity
stem density
reproductive development

본 연구의 목적은 겨울철 약광기 보광 시 줄기 유인 수가 온실 파프리카의 생육, 과실의 품질 및 생산량에 미치는 영향을 구명하는 것이다. 파프리카는 2020년 10월 26일에 m2당 3.2주를 정식하였고, 2020년 12월 1일부터 고압나트륨등을 작기 종료일인 2021년 5월 25일까지 하루 16시간의 광주기로 조사하였다. 줄기 유인 처리는 분지 이후의 생장점이 각각 2, 3개로 유지되도록 유인해 주었다. 초장은 2줄기 유인 처리구에 비해 3줄기 유인 처리구에서 유의적으로 짧았고 마디수 및 엽수는 2줄기 유인 처리구에 비해 3줄기 유인 처리구에서 유의적으로 증가했다. 엽면적 및 기관별 건물중은 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 과실 생체중 및 건물중은 모든 처리구에서 생육단계에 따라 감소하는 경향을 보였으며, 3줄기 유인 처리구가 2줄기 유인 처리구에 비해 낮은 수치를 보였다. 3줄기 유인 처리구의 상품과율은 95.4%로 2줄기 유인 처리구의 93.6%에 비해 높았다. 총 수확량은 3줄기 유인 처리구에서 30.2% 높게 나타났다. 결론적으로 온실 파프리카의 3줄기 유인 재배는 적정 수준의 영양생장을 유지함으로써 과실 생산량에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다고 할 수 있다. 본 연구 결과는 파프리카의 생산량 증대를 위한 농가 의사결정에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

키워드
생산성
생식기관
인공 광원
줄기 밀도
파프리카
References
1
Aloni B., L. Karni, Z. Zaidman, and A.A. Schaffer 1997, The relationship between sucrose supply, sucrose-cleaving enzymes and flower abortion in pepper. Ann Bot 79:601-605. doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0410 10.1006/anbo.1996.0410
2
Alsadon A., M. Wahb-Allah, H. Abdel-Razzak, and A. Ibrahim 2013, Effects of pruning systems on growth, fruit yield and quality traits of three greenhouse-grown bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. Aust J Crop Sci 7:1309-1316. doi:10.3316/informit.619772446005124 10.3316/informit.619772446005124
3
An C.G., D.S. Kang, C.W. Rho, H.S. Kang, and B.R. Jeong 2002. Effect of training an extra shoot on growth and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘Jubilee’ and ‘Fiesta’). Kor J Hort Sci Technol 217-220 (in Korean).
4
An C.G., Y.B. Kim, and B.R. Jeong 2000, Effect of shoot training method on quality and yield of Sinsakigake-2 and Shishito peppers. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 18:503-507 (in Korean)
5
An C.G., Y.H. Hwang, Y.H. Chang, H.Y. Shin, G.W. Song, and B.R. Jeong 2007, Effects of fruiting number of lateral shoot on growth and yield of mini-paprika (Capsicum annuum cv. ‘Hivita red’and ‘Hivita yellow’). Kor J Hort Sci Technol 126-126 (in Korean).
6
Brault D., C. Gueymard, R. Boily, and A. Gosselin 1989, Contribution of HPS lighting to the heating requirements of a greenhouse. Amer Soc Agr Eng 89:25-28.
7
Cebula S. 1995, Optimization of plant and shoot spacing in glasshouse production of sweet pepper. Acta Hortic 412: 321-329. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.412.37 10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.412.37
8
Choi J.K., H.T. Seo, Y.J. Kim, K.J. Park, D.K. Hong, J.H. Won, and A.Y. Ahn 2012, Effect of plant stem density on growth and yield of sweet pepper in summer hydroponics. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 30:86-86.
9
Dasgan H.Y., and K. Abak 2003, Effects of plant density and number of shoots on yield and fruit characteristics of peppers grown in glasshouses. Turk J Agric For 27:29-35.
10
Dorais M. 2003, The use of supplemental lighting for vegetable crop production: Light intensity, crop response, nutrition, crop management, cultural practices. In Proceeding of the Canadian Greenhouse Conference, Octobor 9, 2003.
11
Guo F.C., Y. Fujime, and T. Kato 1991, Effects of the number of training shoots, raising period of seedlings and planting density on growth, fruiting and yield of sweet pepper. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 59:763-770. 10.2503/jjshs.59.763
12
Heuvelink E., and O. Körner 2001, Parthenocarpic fruit growth reduces yield fluctuation and blossom-end rot in sweet pepper. Ann Bot 88:69-74. doi:10.1006/anbo.2001.1427 10.1006/anbo.2001.1427
13
Jang D.C., K.Y. Choi, J.Y. Heo, and I.S. Kim 2016, Comparison of growth and fruit setting characteristics for selecting the optimum winter-planted paprika cultivars. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 34:424-432 (in Korean). doi:10.12972/kjhst.20160043 10.12972/kjhst.20160043
14
Jang D.C., K.Y. Choi, J.Y. Heo, and I.S. Kim 2017, The effect of transplant age on growth and fruit yield in winter-planted paprika cultivation. Hortic Sci Technol 36:470-477. doi:10.12972/kjhst.20180047 10.12972/kjhst.20180047
15
Jeong W.J., D.J. Myung, and J.H. Lee 2009, Comparison of climatic condition of sweet pepper’s greenhouse between korea and the Netherlands, J Bio-Env Con 18:244-252 (in Korean).
16
Jovicich E., D.J. Cantliffe, and G.J. Hochmuth 1999, Plant density and shoot pruning on yield and quality of a summer greenhouse sweet pepper crop in Northcentral Florida. Proceedings 28th National Agricultural Plastics Congress pp 184-190.
17
Jovicich E., D.J. Cantliffe, P.J. Stoffella 2004, Fruit yield and quality of greenhouse-grown bell-pepper as influenced by density, container and trellis system. HortTechnology 14:507-513. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.14.4.0507 10.21273/HORTTECH.14.4.0507
18
Kang W.H., I, Hwang, D.H. Jung, D.P. Kim, J. Kim, J.H. Kim, K.S. Park, and J.E. Son 2019, Time change in spatial distributions of light interception and photosynthetic rate of paprika estimated by ray-tracing simulation. J Bio-Env Con 28:279-285 (in Korean). doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.4.279 10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.4.279
19
Khah E.M. and H.C. Passam 1992, Flowering, fruit set and development of the fruit and seed of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated under conditions of high ambient temperature. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 67:251-258. doi:10.1080/00221589.1992.11516245 10.1080/00221589.1992.11516245
20
Kim E.J., S.H. Lee, and J.H. Lee 2013, Effects of the high pressure sodium lamp lighting on the dynamics of growth and dry mass partitioning in sweet pepper plant. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 31:565-572 (in Korean). doi:10.7235/hort.2013.13037 10.7235/hort.2013.13037
21
Kim H.C., Y.G. Ku, J.H. Lee, J.G. Kang, and J.H. Bae 2012, Comparison plant growth and fruit setting among sweet pepper cultivars of red line. J Bio-Env Con 21:247-251 (in Korean).
22
Kim Y.B., J.H. Bae, and M.H. Park 2011, Effects of supplemental lighting on growth and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in hydroponic culture under low levels of natural light in winter. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 29:317-325 (in Korean).
23
Korea Agricultural Trade Information (KATI) 2019, The state of sweet pepper industry in Korea. Kor Agro-Fisheries Trade Corporation, Seoul, Korea. Available via https://www.kati.net/product/basisInfo.do;jsessionid=2peVO9yaYPasWtAScuCa1LnQKmXJtEZF9myu8TZabadY2tg8JvCbLHJ9geOyhjH5.kati-was_servlet_kati2017?lcdCode=MD147.
24
Kwon J.K., I.H. Yu, K.S. Park, J.H. Lee, J.H. Kim, J.S. Lee, and D.S. Lee 2018, Supplemental lighting by HPS and PLS lamps affects growth and yield of cucumber during low radiation period. J Bio-Env Con 27:400-406 (in Korean). doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.400 10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.400
25
Lee J.H., and J.C. Cha 2009, Effect of remove flowers on dry mass production and photosynthetic efficiency of sweet pepper cultivars ‘Derby’ and ‘Cupra’. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 27:587-590 (in Korean).
26
Lee J.W., H.C. Kim, P.H. Jeong, Y.G. Ku, and J.H. Bae 2014, Effects of supplemental lighting of high pressure sodium and lighting emitting plasma on growth and Productivity of paprika during low radiation period of winter season. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 32:346-352 (in Korean). doi:10.7235/hort.2014.14029 10.7235/hort.2014.14029
27
Maboko M.M., and C. P. du Plooy 2008, Effect of pruning on yield and quality of hydroponically grown cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Afr J Plant Soil 25:178-181. 10.1080/02571862.2008.10639914
28
Maboko M.M., and C.P. du Plooy 2011, Effect of stem and fruit pruning on yield and quality hydroponically grown tomato. Afr Crop Sci Proc 9:27-29. doi:10.5897/AJAR11.1316 10.5897/AJAR11.1316
29
Marcelis L.F.M., E. Heuvelink, L.R.B. Horfman-Eijer, J.D. Bakker, and L.B. Xue 2004, Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength. J Exp Bot 55:2261-2268. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh245 10.1093/jxb/erh245
30
Park K.S., D.Y. Kwon, J.W. Lee, and J.E. Son 2018a, Comparing photosynthesis, growth, and yield of paprika (Capsicum annuum L. ‘Cupra’) under supplemental sulfur plasma and high-pressure sodium lamps in growth chambers and greenhouses. J Bio-Env Con 27:332-340. doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.332 10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.332
31
Park K.S., S.K. Kim, S.G. Lee, H.J. Lee, and J.K. Kwon 2018b, Application of plasma lighting for growth and flowering of tomato plants. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 59:827-833. doi:10.1007/s13580-018-0052-9 10.1007/s13580-018-0052-9
32
Runkle E.S., S.R. Padhye, W. Oh, and K. Getter 2012, Replacing incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps may delay flowering. Sci Hortic 143:56-61. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.05.028 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.05.028
33
UM Z. 2008, Investigation on production techniques in capsicum under protected cultivation. MS Dissertation, Dharwad Univ., pp 1-110.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Bio-Environment Control
  • Journal Title(Ko) :생물환경조절학회지
  • Volume : 30
  • No :3
  • Pages :237-243
  • Received Date : 2021-06-29
  • Revised Date : 2021-07-27
  • Accepted Date : 2021-07-27
  • An Erratum to this article was published on 31 January 2023.
    This article has been updated.
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2021.30.3.237
Journal Informaiton Journal of Bio-Environment Control Journal of Bio-Environment Control
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close