All Issue

2014 Vol.23, Issue 3
30 July 2014. pp. 167-173
Abstract
References
1
ANON. 1972. Glasshouse vegetables. Rep. Glasshouse Crops Res. Inst. 1971:26.
2
Besford, R.T. 1993. Photosynthetic acclimation in tomato plants grown in high CO2. Vegetatio 104: 441-448.
10.1007/BF00048173
3
Cockhull, K.E., C.J. Graves, and C.R.J. Cave. 1992. The influence of shading on yield of glasshouse tomatoes. J. Hortic. Sci. 67: 11-24.
10.1080/00221589.1992.11516215
4
Cockshull, K.E. and L.C. Ho. 1995. Regulation of tomato fruit size by plant density and truss thinning. Journal of Horticultural Science 70:395-407.
10.1080/14620316.1995.11515309
5
De Koning, A.N.M. 1994. Development and dry matter distribution in glasshouse tomato: a quantitative approach. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
6
Dorais, M. and A. Gosselin. 2002. Physiological response of greenhouse vegetable crops to supplemental lighting. Acta Horticulturae 580:59-67.
10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.580.6
7
Guern, J. and M. Usciati. 1972. The present status of the problem of apical dominance In: Hormonal regulation in plant growth and development, (Ed. H. Kaldewey and Y. Vardar). Proc. Adv. Study Inst. Izmir 1971, pp. 383-400.
8
Hao, X., A.B. Hale, and D.P. Ormrod. 1997. The effects of ultraviolet-B radiation and carbon dioxide on growth and photosynthesis of tomato. Canadian Journal of Botany 75:213-219.
10.1139/b97-022
9
Heuvelink, E. 1996. Dry matter partitioning in tomato: validation of a dynamic simulation model. Ann. Bot. 77, 71-80.
10.1006/anbo.1996.0009
10
Heuvelink, E. and M. Dorais. 2005. Crop growth and yield, pp.85-145. In: Heuvelink, E. Crop production science in horticulture series: tomatoes. CABI, UK.
10.1079/9780851993966.0085
11
Ho, L.C. 2004. The contribution of plant physiology in glasshouse tomato soilless culture. Acta Horticulturae 648: 19-25.
10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.648.2
12
Kim, S.E., M.Y. Lee, Y.S. Kim. 2013. Characterization of photosynthetic rates by tomato leaf position. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 31:146-152.
10.7235/hort.2013.12130
13
Kowalska, I. 2004. The effect of sulphate levels in the nutrient solution on mineral composition of leaves and sulphate accumulation in the root zone of tomato plants. Folia Horticulturae 16: 3-14.
14
Leutscher, K.J., E. Heuvelink, R.A. Van de Merwe, and P.C. Van de Bosch. 1996. Evaluation of tomato cultivation strategies: uncertainty analysis using simulation. In: Lokhorst, C., A.J. Udink ten Cate, and A.A. Dijkhuizen.(eds) Information and communication technology applications in agriculture: State of the art and future perspectives. Proceedings of the 6th international congress for computer technology in agriculture (ICCTA '96). VIAS, Wageningen, The Netherlands. pp. 492-497.
15
Lopez, J., M. Dorais, N. Tremblay, and A. Gosselin. 1998. Effects of varying sulfate concentrations and vapor pressure deficits (VPD) on greenhouse tomato fruit quality, foliar nutrient concentration and amino acid components. Acta Hort. 458: 303-310.
10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.458.38
16
Nederhoff, E.M. 1994. Effects of CO2 concentration on photosynthesis, transpiration, and production of greenhouse fruit vegetable crops. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural Uinversity, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 213.
17
Osaki, M., T. Shinano, T. Kaneda, S. Yamada, and T. Nakamura. 2001. Ontogenetic changes of photosynthetic and dark respiration rates in relation to nitrogen content in individual leaves of field crops. Photosynthetica 39:205-213.
10.1023/A:1013774908492
18
Papadopoulos, A.P., X. Hao, J.C. TU, and J. Zheng. 1999. Tomato production in open or closed rockwool culture systems with NFT or rockwool nutrient feedings. Acta Hort. 481: 89-96.
10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.481.6
19
Pivot, D., A. Reiset, and J.M. Gillioz. 1999. Tomates en serre: substrats rutiliss, solutions recycles. Rev. suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 31: 265-269.
20
Peet, M.M. and G. Welles. 2005. Greenhouse tomato production, pp.257-304. In: Heuvelink, E. Crop production science in horticulture series: tomatoes. CABI, UK.
10.1079/9780851993966.0257
21
Phillips, I.D.J. 1975. Apical dominance. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 26: 341.
10.1146/annurev.pp.26.060175.002013
22
Resh, H.M. 2013. Plant culture, pp.410-427. In: Resh, H.M. Hydroponic food production. CRC press, New York.
23
Stanghellini, C., F.L.K. Kempkes, and P. Knies. 2003. Enhancing envirnmental quality in agriculthral systems. Acta Horticulturae 609: 277-283.
10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.609.41
24
Strack, Z. 1983. Photosynthesis and endogenous regulation of the source-sink relation in tomato plants. Photosynthetica 17:1-11.
25
Terabayshi, S., A. Sugimoto, K. Ohshita, and T. Namiki. 1995. Relationship Between crease-stem abnormality and boron content in tomato plants cultured with high sulfate nutrient solution. Acta Horticulturae 396: 131-136.
10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.396.14
26
Tucker, D.J. 1976. Endogenous growth regulators in relation to side shoot development in the tomato. New Phytol. 77: 561-568.
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1976.tb04647.x
27
Yelle, S. 1988. Acclimatation de Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Aux hautes concentrations de l'atmosphere en bioxide de carbone. These de doctorat, Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada, pp.150.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory
  • Journal Title(Ko) :시설원예ㆍ식물공장
  • Volume : 23
  • No :3
  • Pages :167-173
  • Received Date : 2014-06-05
  • Revised Date : 2014-06-23
  • Accepted Date : 2014-07-22