Original Articles

Journal of Bio-Environment Control. 30 April 2026. 139-153
https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2026.35.2.139

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   1. Effects of DIF during seedling stage on tomato seedling quality

  •   2. Effects of seedling-stage DIF on early yield after transplanting in greenhouse

  • Results and Discussion

  •   1. Effects of DIF treatments during the nursery stage on tomato seedling quality

  •   2. Effects of DIF treatments during the nursery stage on early growth and yield after transplanting

  • Conclusion

Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most economically important greenhouse vegetable crops in East Asia, where the adoption of smart‑farm environmental control technologies and hydroponic culture systems has accelerated the expansion of long‑term cultivation systems (Kubota et al. 2008; Van Iersel and Gianino 2017). In such production systems, stable and uniform growth and development are essential for maximizing farmers’ income, because uniform early growth and stable establishment immediately after transplanting are critical determinants of overall yield potential. Poor early establishment often delays the development of the first inflorescence and reduces fruit set, ultimately resulting in substantial yield losses (Schwarz et al. 2010). Consequently, improving seedling quality during the nursery phase is a key management objective for securing productivity and economic returns in long‑term tomato cultivation. In greenhouse nurseries, thermal and light environments fluctuate substantially across seasons. During the early summer period (May to July), seedlings are frequently exposed to high temperatures, which exacerbate excessive stem elongation and lead to the production of weak transplants. High temperature and suboptimal light conditions reduce stem diameter, inhibit root system development, and limit leaf expansion, all of which contribute to diminished seedling quality (Bertram and Karlsen 1994; Myster and Moe 1995). With the increasing adoption of late-summer transplanting (e.g., August), followed by year-round harvest in large-scale Korean greenhouses, low-quality seedlings produced under high-temperature conditions have increasingly been associated with delayed post-transplant growth, slower inflorescence development, and reduced early yield. Thus, urgent need for environmental management strategies that maintain robust seedling quality under high-temperature stress becomes inevitable.

Manipulation of temperature regimes during seedling production has been widely evaluated as a non-chemical growth regulation strategy. Among these, the difference between day and night temperature (DIF) is recognized as an environmental factor for controlling stem elongation and improving transplant compactness (Bertram and Karlsen 1994; Langton and Cockshull 1997). In particular, a negative DIF (-DIF), in which night time temperature exceeds daytime temperature, strongly suppresses internode elongation and is considered a promising technique for mitigating heat-induced seedling elongation. The day–night temperature difference (DIF) influences the partitioning and storage of photosynthates by altering the balance between photosynthesis during the day and dark respiration at night, thereby regulating plant morphology and growth habit (Yamaura et al. 2023). In addition, short-term low- temperature pulses applied before sunrise have been shown to reduce stem elongation without increasing daily mean temperature, representing an energy-efficient approach for height control under warm conditions (Myster and Moe 1995).

Although numerous studies have evaluated the morphological responses of seedlings to DIF manipulation, research has predominantly focused on growth characteristics during the nursery stage (Ohtaka et al. 2020, Kim et al. 2023). Though studies like that of Li et al. (2015) studied yield characteristics based on DIF, far fewer studies have examined the carry-over effects of nursery temperature regimes on post-transplant vegetative growth, reproductive development, fruit set, and early yield performance (Blanchard and Runkle 2007; Ali et al. 2022).

Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the morphological traits and chlorophyll content (as a physiological parameter) of tomato seedlings to differing DIF regimes during the nursery stage and to determine how variations in seedling quality influence early post-transplant growth, inflorescence development, fruit set stability, and early yield. By elucidating these carry-over effects, this research aims to provide science-based guidance for producing robust seedlings capable of withstanding high- temperature nursery conditions and to support the development of reliable transplant management strategies that enhance early reproductive stability and productivity in long-term greenhouse tomato cultivation.

Materials and Methods

1. Effects of DIF during seedling stage on tomato seedling quality

1.1 Planting material and growing conditions

A European-type tomato cultivar (Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Redkhan’; Mifuko Seed Co., Ltd., Korea) was used in this study. Seeds were sown into 32-cell plug trays filled with a horticultural substrate (‘Fieldwang’; Nongwoobio Co., Ltd., Korea) composed of 69.9% cocopeat, 15% peatmoss, 10% perlite, and 5% zeolite (v/v). The nursery period was for 7 weeks from 10 April to 30 May 2025 in a fully controlled plant production system located within the Smart Farm Innovation Valley (Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea), using a growth chamber (EH-3600, Hi-point, Taiwan).

1.2 DIF treatments

DIF was defined as the temperature difference between the day and night periods. The photoperiod was maintained from 06:00 to 22:00, and the dark period from 22:00 to 06:00. Four DIF treatments were applied continuously throughout the 7-week seedling stage: -8°C DIF (18/26°C Day/night), -5°C DIF (20/25°C), 0°C DIF (22/22°C), and +5°C DIF (25/20°C). All growth chambers were operated under identical environmental conditions other than temperature, with relative humidity maintained at 70% and CO2 concentration held near ambient levels (approximately 420 μmol·mol-1). Irrigation was supplied via a bottom-watering system once every two days during the first 3 weeks of the nursery period. From week 4 to week 7, the irrigation frequency was increased to once daily to meet the increasing water demand of the seedlings and maintain stable moisture levels in the horticultural substrate.

1.3 Lighting conditions

Multi-wavelength LEDs (UV 385–396 nm, blue 425-450 nm, green 525 nm, red 625-660 nm, far-red 730 nm, and white) were used as the light source (Taiwan Hipoint corporation, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was measured at centre and corners at the height of seedlings using a LI-180 spectrometer (LI-COR, Lincoln, USA). PPFD was maintained at 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 under a 16/8 h (light/dark) photoperiod. Environmental variables, including temperature, were continuously monitored and automatically adjusted to minimize fluctuations.

1.4 Growth Measurements

Seedling growth was evaluated weekly using nine plants per treatment (three per replication). Measurements included plant height, stem diameter, node number, leaf number, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, SPAD value, and shoot and root fresh and dry weights.

Stem diameter was measured 1 cm above the substrate surface using a digital caliper (DC150P, Bluetec, China). Leaf length and width measurements were taken on the third fully expanded leaf below the apex. Leaf area was determined using a leaf area meter (LI-3100C, LI-COR, USA).

Fresh weights of shoots and roots were measured separately, then the samples were dried at 70°C for 72 h and reweighed to determine their dry weights. Chlorophyll content was estimated indirectly using a SPAD meter (SPAD‑502, Minolta, Japan), with three readings averaged per leaf.

1.5 Experimental design and statistical analysis

The experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design consisting of four DIF treatments with three replications. Each treatment included three 32-cell plug trays, for a total of 96 plants, and growth measurements were obtained from nine uniform plants selected across the three replications. All data were analysed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test treatment effects, and Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was applied at P < 0.05 when significance was detected. Figures were generated using SigmaPlot 12.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

2. Effects of seedling-stage DIF on early yield after transplanting in greenhouse

2.1 Cultivation conditions

Seedlings produced under each DIF treatment were transplanted on 30 May 2025 into a plastic greenhouse located in Haman, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea. Plants were grown for 13 weeks until 20 August 2025. Coir substrate (coconut coir) slabs (chip: dust = 5:5, v/v; Shinhan Atec, Korea) were used as the growing medium. Plants were spaced to achieve a density of 3.125 plants·m-2 (31 cm within-row spacing).

Greenhouse environmental control maintained average temperatures near 28 ± 2°C and 60-80% relative humidity. To maintain the internal temperature near 28 ± 2°C during the high-temperature period from late May to August, industrial air conditioners were operated. The cooling system was configured to activate automatically when the internal temperature exceeded 26°C, particularly during hours of high solar radiation from 09:00 to 18:00, to ensure a stable growing environment. A standard Yamazaki nutrient solution was supplied via drip irrigation with EC 2.8 dS·m-1 and pH 6.0. Irrigation was applied every 20 min from 07:30 to 16:30, delivering approximately 80 mL per event per plant.

2.2 Growth measurements

Vegetative growth parameters (plant height, stem diameter, node number, leaf length, leaf width, and stem diameter at the growth zone) were measured every 2 weeks. The growth- zone stem diameter was measured 10 cm below the inflorescence. Leaf area was estimated using a non-destructive regression model described by Carmassi et al. (2007):

Leafarea(cm2)=-10.12+0.834×(0.5×leaflength×leafwidth)

Total leaf area per plant was calculated as the cumulative sum of estimated leaf areas based on sampled leaves. Reproductive development was evaluated by counting flower buds, open flowers, and fruit set for each inflorescence. Early yield was measured from the first two trusses; fruit number, fresh weight, and mean fruit weight were recorded. Yield per plant (g·plant-1) was converted to area-based yield (t·ha-1) using planting density.

2.3 Experimental design and statistical analysis

The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications, and seven plants per replication (21 plants per treatment). Growth and yield measurements were taken from three plants per replication (n = 9). All data were analysed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test treatment effects, and Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was applied at P < 0.05 when significance was detected. Figures were generated using SigmaPlot 12.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Results and Discussion

1. Effects of DIF treatments during the nursery stage on tomato seedling quality

1.1 Early versus late nursery stage: a reversal in growth pattern

DIF treatments induced strong responses throughout the nursery period, but the treatment that performed best changed dramatically between early and late growth stages. During the first 3-4 weeks, seedlings grown under +5°C DIF showed the greatest leaf expansion, shoot elongation, and biomass accumulation (Tables 1, 2, 3). This reflects the well-known effect of higher daytime temperatures on photosynthetic activity and cell division (Grimstad 1994; Myster and Moe 1995; Moore et al. 2021). However, from week 5 onward, this pattern reversed. Seedlings under +5°C DIF developed leaf rolling, chlorosis, and premature senes-cence (Figs. 1 and 2), while those under -5 °C DIF, which had been slower initially, but gradually caught up and then surpassed all other treatments. By week 7, the -5°C DIF seedlings had achieved the largest leaf area (535.2 cm2, more than twice that of +5°C DIF seedlings), the thickest stems, the longest roots, and the highest total dry weight (4.6g) (Tables 2 and 3). This reversal shows that moderate negative DIF suppresses early elongation but preserves long-term physiological vigor, enabling sustained leaf and root development in the late nursery stage (Bertram and Karlsen, 1994; Ohtaka et al. 2020). Chlorophyll concentration (SPAD) initially favored +5°C DIF seedlings, but no treatment differences were detectable after week 5, confirming that DIF primarily affects quantitative growth traits (leaf expansion, biomass) rather than chlorophyll density.

Table 1

Effects of various DIF treatments on number of leaves, leaf area, leaf length, leaf width and SPAD values of tomato seedlings grown in a controlled growth chamber during the nursery periods

DIF treatment No. of leaves Leaf
area
(cm2)
Leaf SPAD
values
Length
(cm)
Width
(cm)
Growth stage: 3rd week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 1.0 bz 1.8 c 2.0 c 1.2 c 37.2 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 1.1 b 4.8 b 2.4 c 1.7 bc 41.0 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 3.1 a 5.8 b 3.1 b 2.1 b 38.1 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 3.4 a 9.9 a 4.3 a 3.4 a 43.2 a
Growth stage: 4th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 3.6 c 43.1 d 9.8 c 7.5 c 40.9 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 4.4 b 74.0 c 12.4 b 10.0 b 38.6 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 5.0 ab 91.3 b 12.3 b 10.0 b 42.4 ab
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 5.3 a 124.9 a 16.0 a 13.3 a 45.9 a
Growth stage: 5th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 4.9 b 131.3 b 15.2 b 11.8 b 43.9 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 5.0 b 200.3 a 18.2 a 16.0 a 44.3 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 6.4 a 207.1 a 18.7 a 15.8 a 48.6 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 6.4 a 210.4 a 19.0 a 15.4 a 46.8 a
Growth stage: 6th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 7.8 a 239.8 b 22.0 a 18.3 a 43.0 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 7.8 a 296.2 a 22.4 a 18.0 a 42.5 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 8.2 a 231.4 b 20.1 b 18.9 a 41.3 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 7.7 a 161.1 c 18.0 c 14.3 b 41.9 a
Growth stage: 7th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 10.1 a 450.1 b 24.5 a 20.9 a 45.6 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 10.0 a 535.2 a 22.7 b 17.7 b 43.5 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 10.4 a 330.7 c 22.0 b 17.3 b 45.1 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 10.4 a 235.9 d 19.6 c 16.9 b 49.9 a

zMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/phpf/2026-035-02/N0090350208/images/phpf_35_02_08_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Representative morphological appearance of tomato seedlings grown under differences between day and night temperature -8°C DIF (18/26°C Day/night), -5°C DIF (20/25°C), 0°C DIF (22/22°C), and +5°C DIF (25/20°C) at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 weeks after treatment (WAT)

1.2 Shoot elongation versus stem thickening and root growth

The temporal shift described above was accompanied by a fundamental change in plant structure. Under +5°C DIF, rapid internode elongation and node production occurred at the clear expense of stem thickening and root development (Table 2, Fig. 2). The result was weak, elongated shoots with relatively underdeveloped root systems which is a classic positive-DIF syndrome (Erwin and Heins, 1995; Kubota et al. 2008; Schwarz et al. 2010). In contrast, the -5°C DIF regime promoted only moderate early elongation, followed by steady stem thickening and robust root growth. By week 5, -5°C DIF seedlings already had the greatest stem diameter (5.5 mm) and longest root length (24.3 cm) (Table 2). Negative DIF is known to reduce gibberellin-mediated elongation and lower respiratory carbon loss under high daytime temperatures, thereby increasing carbohydrate availability for roots and supportive tissues (Song et al. 2023; Yamaura et al. 2023). By the end of the nursery period, the -5°C DIF seedlings had developed a compact, sturdy shoot–root architecture that closely resembles the description of high-quality transplants in earlier DIF studies (Myster and Moe 1995; Van Iersel and Gianino 2017). The +5°C DIF seedlings, by contrast, remained elongated and structurally compromised.

Table 2

Effects of various DIF treatments on number of nodes, stem diameter, plant height and root length of tomato seedlings grown in a controlled growth chamber during the nursery periods

DIF treatment No. of nodes Stem diameter
(mm)
Plant height
(cm)
Root length
(cm)
Growth stage: 3rd week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 1.0 bz 1.1 c 3.4 c 4.9 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 1.0 b 1.1 c 3.4 c 5.6 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 2.0 a 1.6 b 4.0 b 7.3 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 2.0 a 2.0 a 4.8 a 8.2 a
Growth stage: 4th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 3.6 c 3.2 c 6.6 c 15.3 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 4.4 b 3.7 b 8.2 b 15.8 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 5.0 ab 3.8 b 9.0 b 17.6 ab
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 5.3 a 4.8 a 16.2 a 19.1 a
Growth stage: 5th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 4.9 b 4.5 c 10.1 c 18.7 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 5.0 b 5.5 a 14.3 b 24.3 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 5.2 b 4.8 bc 15.3 b 21.6 ab
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 6.0 a 5.1 ab 24.5 a 22.2 a
Growth stage: 6th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 6.8 b 5.2 a 24.2 c 21.8 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 6.6 b 5.7 a 28.9 b 24.7 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 7.8 a 5.2 a 35.2 a 22.6 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 6.8 b 5.2 a 35.7 a 22.6 a
Growth stage: 7th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 9.1 b 5.8 a 38.4 b 23.1 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 8.9 b 5.9 a 43.8 a 24.7 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 9.4 ab 5.6 a 45.7 a 22.6 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 10.0 a 5.6 a 44.8 a 22.6 a

zMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

1.3 Biomass accumulation

Fresh and dry weights also exhibited the same characteristic shift in treatment superiority between early and late nursery stages (Table 3, Fig. 2). During the early stage (3-5 weeks), seedlings grown under +5°C DIF had the greatest shoot and root fresh weights as well as the highest total dry weight, reflecting enhanced photosynthetic carbon assimilation and metabolic activity under higher daytime temperatures. However, by week 7, this pattern had reversed. Seedlings grown under -5°C DIF and 0°C DIF accumulated the greatest total fresh and dry weights. The -5 °C DIF treatment produced the highest total dry weight (4.6 g) and the greatest root dry weight (0.3 g) (Table 3), indicating superior biomass partitioning to the root system. In contrast, +5°C DIF seedlings exhibited a decline in total dry matter and a reduced proportion of biomass allocated to roots. This reduction supports the interpretation that positive DIF, while effective in accelerating early growth, may lead to premature senescence and diminished physiological vigor during extended nursery periods (Blanchard and Runkle 2007; Vaid et al. 2014). Further, An et al. (2021) reported that transplants with higher dry matter accumulation relative to plant height, and with well-developed root systems, exhibit superior early establishment and yield potential after transplanting. The seedlings produced under -5°C DIF in the present study consistently met these criteria, indicating that this DIF regime supports the development of structurally and physiologically robust transplants.

Table 3

Effects of various DIF treatments on fresh weight, and dry weight of tomato seedlings grown in a controlled growth chamber during the nursery periods

DIF treatment Fresh weight
(g/plant)
Dry weight
(g/plant)
Shoot Root Total Shoot Root Total
Growth stage: 3rd week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 0.2 cz 0.0 b 0.2 c 0.0 c 0.0 c 0.0 c
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 0.2 c 0.0 b 0.2 c 0.0 c 0.0 bc 0.0 c
0 22℃ / 22℃ 0.3 b 0.0 b 0.3 b 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 0.6 a 0.0 a 0.6 a 0.1 a 0.0 a 0.1 a
Growth stage: 4th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 2.0 d 0.2 b 2.2 d 0.2 d 0.0 c 0.2 c
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 3.1 c 0.2 b 3.3 c 0.3 c 0.0 c 0.4 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 3.7 b 0.2 b 3.9 b 0.4 b 0.0 b 0.5 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 6.2 a 0.4 a 6.5 a 0.6 a 0.1 a 0.7 a
Growth stage: 5th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 5.6 c 0.5 b 6.1 c 0.6 c 0.1 b 0.6 c
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 9.7 b 0.8 a 10.5 b 1.0 b 0.1 a 1.1 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 10.0 b 0.7 ab 10.6 b 0.9 b 0.1 ab 1.0 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 12.9 a 0.9 a 13.8 a 1.3 a 0.1 a 1.4 a
Growth stage: 6th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 19.7 a 1.1 ab 20.7 a 1.4 b 0.1 b 1.5 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 22.2 a 1.2 a 23.4 a 2.0 a 0.2 a 2.2 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 21.3 a 0.9 b 23.2 a 2.1 a 0.1 bc 2.2 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 15.7 b 1.0 b 16.7 b 2.2 a 0.1 c 2.3 a
Growth stage: 7th week
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 35.9 ab 1.2 b 37.1 ab 3.8 b 0.2 ab 4.1 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 38.8 a 1.5 a 40.2 a 4.4 a 0.3 a 4.6 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 33.4 b 1.2 b 34.6 b 4.5 a 0.2 ab 4.8 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 21.6 c 1.1 b 22.7 c 3.7 b 0.2 b 3.9 b

zMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/phpf/2026-035-02/N0090350208/images/phpf_35_02_08_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Changes in plant growth characteristics of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse as affected by DIF treatments during the seedling stage. Each parameter was assessed at weekly. Different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05 (n = 9)

2. Effects of DIF treatments during the nursery stage on early growth and yield after transplanting

2.1 Carry-over effects on vegetative growth after transplanting

Despite all plants being grown under identical conditions after transplanting, the DIF regimes imposed during the nursery stage produced clear carry-over effects on establishment, canopy development, and subsequent growth (Table 4, Fig. 3). During the first 3 weeks after transplanting, seedlings from the -5°C DIF treatment established the fastest canopy expansion and leaf development. At 1 week after transplanting, their leaf area (535.2 cm2) was more than twice that of +5°C DIF seedlings, and this advantage persisted through week 3 (Table 4). This rapid establishment directly reflected the superior root systems and balanced shoot structure that these seedlings had acquired during the nursery stage (Ohtaka et al. 2020). In contrast, +5°C DIF seedlings showed delayed leaf unfolding, thinner stems, and partial chlorosis symptoms consistent with excessive respiratory carbon consumption and poor root development during the nursery period (Langton and Cockshull 1997).

Table 4

Effects of DIF treatments during the seedling stage on leaf growth characteristics and SPAD values of tomato plants at different growth stages after transplanting in a greenhouse

DIF treatment No. of leaves Leaf
area
(cm2)
Leaf SPAD
values
Length
(cm)
Width
(cm)
1 week after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 10.1 az 450.1 b 24.5 a 20.9 a 45.6 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 10.0 a 535.2 a 22.7 b 17.7 b 43.5 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 10.4 a 330.7 b 22.0 b 17.3 b 45.1 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 10.4 a 235.9 c 19.6 c 16.9 b 49.9 a
3 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 12.9 ab 3098.0 a 29.4 a 20.2 a 51.6 ab
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 13.8 a 3350.5 a 30.1 a 20.0 a 55.0 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 12.0 bc 2684.6 ab 28.7 a 19.5 a 53.6 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 10.8 c 2554.4 b 29.2 a 19.9 a 47.7 b
5 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 20.0 a 4787.9ab 29.7 b 20.1 b 53.3 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 19.1 a 4568.2b 30.3 b 18.6 b 53.5 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 19.7 a 5933.6a 39.5 a 26.5 a 54.3 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 19.0 a 5840.4a 38.3 a 26.2 a 52.8 a
7 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 25.3 a 5669.5 b 27.2 b 15.5 b 52.0 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 25.8 a 6636.1 ab 31.7 a 24.4 a 51.0 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 25.4 a 7411.7 a 31.0 a 20.5 a 54.4 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 24.6 a 6818.4 ab 28.0 ab 15.7 b 54.2 a
9 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 30.7 a 6475.9 b 25.7 a 14.9 a 55.0 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 30.9 a 7385.4 ab 25.6 a 14.2 a 50.6 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 31.1 a 8111.0 a 23.8 a 13.4 a 50.1 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 30.0 a 7662.5 ab 26.4 a 14.7 a 52.1 ab
13 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 35.0 a 6988.8 b 23.8a 13.6a 62.6 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 35.7 a 7867.1 ab 23.0a 11.4b 59.2 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 35.3 a 8600.0 a 23.4a 12.8ab 60.4 ab
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 33.0 b 8000.6 ab 23.6a 12.6ab 58.4 b

zMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/phpf/2026-035-02/N0090350208/images/phpf_35_02_08_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Morphological appearance of tomato plants at 13 weeks after transplanting to DIF treatments applied during the seedling stage: -8°C DIF (18/26°C Day/night), -5°C DIF (20/25°C), 0°C DIF (22/22°C), and +5°C DIF (25/20°C)

During mid-growth (5-9 weeks after transplanting), plants from the 0 °C DIF and +5°C DIF treatments showed accelerated leaf area expansion, but this represented excessive vegetative dominance rather than balanced growth. Such over-vigorous vegetative expansion is known to divert assimilates away from developing fruit and reduce reproductive efficiency (Myster and Moe 1995; Si and Heins 1996). By the final evaluation at 13 weeks, plants from the 0 °C DIF treatment had the largest leaf area (8,600 cm2), but -5 °C DIF plants produced the greatest number of leaves (35.7 leaves), indicating sustained node production and stable vegetative development (Table 4). Chlorophyll concentration (SPAD) did not differ markedly among treatments throughout most of the growth period, although -8°C DIF plants showed the highest SPAD values by week 13, suggesting delayed leaf senescence under strong negative DIF.

2.2 Carry-over effects on stem growth and node differentiation

Persistent effects were also evident in stem elongation, thickening, and node development after transplanting (Table 5, Fig. 4). At 1 week after transplanting, seedlings from the +5 °C DIF treatment had the greatest number of nodes (10.0), reflecting accelerated meristematic activity during nursery production, but their stems were significantly thinner. In contrast, -5°C DIF seedlings maintained the thickest stem base (5.9 mm), demonstrating that the structural robustness developed during nursery production was retained after transplanting. This enhanced stem thickening under negative DIF has been attributed to reduced gibberellin- mediated elongation and more favorable carbon allocation to supporting tissues (Myster and Moe 1995).

Table 5

Effects of DIF treatments during the seedling stage on number of nodes, basal stem diameter, apical stem diameter, and plant height of tomato plants at different growth stages after transplanting in a greenhouse

DIF treatment No. of nodes Basal stem
diameter
(mm)
Apical stem
diameter
(mm)
Plant height
(cm)
1 week after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 9.1 bz 5.8 a 2.8 b 38.4 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 8.9 b 5.9 a 2.6 b 43.8 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 9.4 ab 5.6 a 2.8 ab 45.7 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 10.0 a 5.6 a 3.1 a 44.8 a
3 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 12.9 a 10.4 a 3.9 b 103.7 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 13.7 a 9.9 ab 3.8 b 101.1 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 12.4 a 9.1 bc 3.7 b 92.2 ab
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 10.0 b 8.1 c 5.5 a 80.1 b
5 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 19.8 a 10.7 a 6.3 b 168.7 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 18.9 ab 10.9 a 5.6 c 161.3 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 19.3 a 10.9 a 5.9 bc 150.6 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 18.2 b 9.9 b 7.0 a 136.2 c
7 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 25.1 a 10.8 a 7.2 a 221.8 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 25.8 a 11.0 a 5.7 b 209.1 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 25.1 a 11.1 a 7.3 a 198.8 c
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 23.8 b 10.1 b 6.9 a 186.3 d
9 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 30.4 a 11.0 a 6.0 a 262.1 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 31.1 a 11.3 a 5.4 a 255.1 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 30.8 a 11.3 a 5.9 a 241.5 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 29.2 b 10.4 b 6.0 a 228.8 c
13 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 35.3 a 11.2 a 6.3 b 269.5 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 35.7 a 11.3 a 5.4 c 270.1 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 35.3 a 11.4 a 7.0 a 263.7 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 33.3 b 10.6 b 6.0 b 259.8 a

zMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/phpf/2026-035-02/N0090350208/images/phpf_35_02_08_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Changes in plant height and basal stem diameter of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse as affected by DIF treatments during the seedling stage. Each parameter was assessed at 2-week intervals. Different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05 (n = 9)

By week 3 after transplanting, both -5°C DIF and -8°C DIF seedlings exhibited greater plant height (approximately 101-104 cm) compared with the +5°C DIF treatment (80.1 cm) (Table 5). This pattern suggests compensatory growth, in which previously height-restricted seedlings increase elongation once environmental constraints are removed (Ohtaka et al., 2020). Notably, the -8°C DIF seedlings retained a base stem diameter substantially greater (approximately 28% larger) than that of +5 °C DIF plants, indicating that compensatory elongation did not compromise structural integrity. Throughout the remainder of the growth period, -5°C DIF plants maintained the most stable elongation rate and node formation, resulting in the greatest final plant height and node number at week 13 (Table 5). In contrast, 0°C DIF plants exhibited excessive apical thickening and vegetative dominance, while +5°C DIF plants consistently showed the lowest values for stem elongation, stem diameter, and node count. These outcomes align with previous reports that excessively high daytime temperatures during seedling production accelerate metabolic consumption of assimilates and negatively affect sustained growth after transplanting (Langton and Cockshull 1997).

2.3 Effects on flowering, fruit set, and earliness

Differences in seedling quality induced by DIF treatments during the nursery stage had pronounced carry-over effects on floral development, flowering, and fruit set after transplanting (Table 6). At 3 weeks after transplanting, seedlings from the -5°C DIF treatment produced the highest number of set fruits (2.1 fruits·plant-1), indicating superior early fruit-set stability. In contrast, −8 °C DIF seedlings produced the greatest numbers of floral primordia and open flowers, but their fruit set was limited (1.2 fruits·plant-1) (Table 6). This discrepancy suggests that excessive floral differentiation under strong negative DIF intensifies competition for assimilates, thereby reducing early fruit-set efficiency (Marcelis 1996; Kang et al. 2011). Seedlings from the +5 °C DIF treatment consistently showed the lowest numbers of flowers, open blooms, and set fruits, implying that positive DIF suppresses or delays the transition to reproductive development after transplanting.

During mid-growth (5-7 weeks after transplanting), plants in the -8°C DIF treatment displayed rapid progression of reproductive growth, producing the highest total numbers of flowers (28.0), open blooms (15.9), and fruits (9.1) by 7 weeks after transplanting. However, these values were not statistically different from those observed in the -5 and 0°C DIF treatments (7.8-8.0 set fruits) (Table 6), suggesting that enhanced floral initiation under strong negative DIF does not necessarily translate into improved fruit-set stability. This aligns with earlier findings that fruit retention depends more on physiological balance than on the sheer number of floral primordia (Marcelis 1996; Kang et al. 2011).

Table 6

Effects of DIF treatments during the seedling stage on lowers, number of blooms, and number of fruit sets of tomato plants at different growth stages after transplanting in a greenhouse

DIF treatment No. of flowers No. of blooms No. of fruit sets
3 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 17.4 az 4.2 a 1.2 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 13.8 b 2.4 b 2.1 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 11.0 c 1.7 b 0.4 c
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 8.1 d 0.7 c 0.2 c
5 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 24.1 a 4.4 b 8.7 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 18.9 b 8.7 a 6.2 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 22.4 a 9.1 a 6.9 b
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 15.0 c 8.2 a 4.2 c
7 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 28.0 a 15.9 a 9.1 a
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 25.1 b 13.9 b 7.8 a
0 22℃ / 22℃ 24.9 b 11.6 c 8.0 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 24.1 b 13.6 b 5.3 b
9 weeks after transplanting
-8 18℃ / 26℃ 28.2 a 4.3 b 9.1 b
-5 20℃ / 25℃ 24.2 a 3.2 b 9.9 b
0 22℃ / 22℃ 26.2 a 6.4 a 13.7 a
+5 25℃ / 20℃ 26.8 a 3.6 b 6.3 c

zMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

Negative DIF treatments advanced harvest onset by at least 2 weeks compared with non-DIF or positive DIF conditions (Table 7). By 7 weeks after transplanting, approximately 55% of the plants in the -8 and -5°C DIF treatments had entered the harvestable stage, while no plants in the 0 or +5°C DIF treatments had produced ripe fruit (Fig. 6). At 9 weeks after transplanting, the -8°C DIF treatment showed the fastest transition to maturity, with 80% of plants having at least one harvestable fruit. However, full-plant harvestability was achieved simultaneously in -5 and 0°C DIF seedlings at 11 weeks after transplanting, indicating that strong negative DIF may accelerate early maturity at the cost of increased plant-to-plant variability. The -5°C DIF treatment ensured both advanced earliness and higher uniformity in harvest progression.

Table 7

Effects of DIF treatments during the seedling stage on cumulative fruit number, cumulative fruit weight, mean fruit weight, and estimated yield of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse

DIF treatment Cumulative fruit
numberz
(no./plant)
Cumulative fruit
weight
(g/plant)
Mean fruit
weight (g/fruit)
Yield per planty
(t/ha)
-8 DIF 18℃ / 26℃ 6.9 ax 657.6 ab 95.6 a 20.5 ab
-5 DIF 20℃ / 25℃ 7.6 a 714.2 a 98.9 a 22.3 a
0 DIF 22℃ / 22℃ 5.4 ab 502.7 ab 91.5 a 15.7 ab
+5 DIF 25℃ / 20℃ 4.1 b 406.3 b 97.8 a 12.7 b

zValues represent final cumulative fruit number recorded at the last harvest from the first and second trusses.

yYield (t/ha) was calculated based on cumulative fruit weight per plant and planting density.

xMeans within a column at each growth stage followed by different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05.

Cumulative yield per plant was highest in the -5°C DIF treatment (714.2 g·plant-1), approximately 75% greater than the yield obtained from +5°C DIF seedlings (406.3 g·plant-1) (Fig. 5). Estimated yield per hectare followed the same pattern (22.3 vs. 12.7 t·ha-1) (Table 7). Mean fruit weight did not differ among treatments (91.5-98.9 g), confirming that yield differences were attributable primarily to fruit-set stability and earlier harvest initiation rather than to differences in fruit growth rate or final fruit size. The high early yield in the -5 and -8°C DIF treatments can be attributed to robust seedling quality and stable floral differentiation achieved during the nursery stage. In particular, -5°C DIF facilitated balanced vegetative–reproductive growth, enabling more effective partitioning of assimilates to enlarging fruits (Heuvelink 1995, 1996; Marcelis 1996). Conversely, the low early yield in 0 and +5 °C DIF plants likely resulted from etiolation-like growth during the nursery stage, which increased vegetative assimilate consumption and reduced subsequent allocation to fruit sinks after transplanting (Talukder et al., 2025).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/phpf/2026-035-02/N0090350208/images/phpf_35_02_08_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Changes in number of fruit sets and cumulative fruit weight of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse as affected by DIF treatments during the seedling stage. Each parameter was assessed at 2-week intervals. Different letters are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05 (n = 9)

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/phpf/2026-035-02/N0090350208/images/phpf_35_02_08_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Changes in harvest rate of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse as affected by DIF treatments during the seedling stage. Harvest rate was assessed at 2-week intervals and expressed as the percentage of plants producing harvestable fruits relative to the total number of plants per treatment (n = 9)

Taken together, the results demonstrate a consistent time-dependent pattern: +5°C DIF drives early rapid growth but leads to late-nursery senescence, poor root development, and post-transplant weakness, whereas -5°C DIF delays early expansion but produces compact, structurally balanced seedlings with superior late-nursery vigor, faster post- transplant establishment, higher fruit-set efficiency, and significantly greater early yield. These findings reinforce earlier reports that moderate negative DIF enhances transplant quality by regulating elongation growth without compromising later-stage vigor (Bertram and Karlsen 1994). Furthermore, Kim and Hwang (2019) demonstrated that precise environmental temperature control can produce high-quality, compact transplants without the need for chemical growth regulators, highlighting the potential of physical methods over chemical ones in modern transplant production systems. The present findings confirm that moderate negative DIF represents an effective method for managing transplant vigor and improving seedling robustness in high-temperature nursery environments.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that differential day-night temperature regimes (DIF) applied during the tomato seedling stage exert significant and lasting effects on seedling quality, vegetative development after transplanting, reproductive performance, and early yield. Seedlings exhibited distinct growth responses depending on the magnitude and direction of DIF, confirming that thermal gradients act as strong morphological and physiological cues during early development. In contrast, -5°C DIF resulted in slower early shoot growth but produced seedlings with greater stem diameter, more balanced shoot-root development, and higher biomass accumulation by the end of the nursery period. These attributes are characteristic of high-quality, compact, and physiologically robust transplants. Carry-over effects of DIF treatments persisted after transplanting. Seedlings grown under -5°C DIF exhibited the most rapid recovery and canopy establishment, produced the largest leaf area and leaf number by 3 weeks after transplanting, and maintained superior stem strength and node differentiation throughout the growth period. Reproductive development was similarly influenced by nursery DIF conditions. The -5°C DIF regime produced the highest number of set fruits on the first truss and maintained stable fruit set throughout the cropping period, while -8°C DIF induced excessive floral initiation but resulted in low fruit-set efficiency. Overall, -5°C DIF represents the optimal thermal strategy for producing vigorous, compact tomato seedlings with superior post-transplant performance and early yield. Moderate negative DIF provides an effective, non-chemical approach for high-temperature nurseries.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. RS-2025-02303116)”, Rural Development Administration, Korea.

References

1

Ali MR, Quddus MA, Trina TN, Salim MMR, Asaduzzaman M (2022) Influence of plant growth regulators on growth, yield, and quality of tomato grown under high temperature in the tropics in the summer. Int J Veg Sci 28:59-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2020.1828526

10.1080/19315260.2020.1828526
2

An S, Bae JH, Kim HC, Kwack Y (2021) Production of grafted vegetable seedlings in the Republic of Korea: achievements, challenges and perspectives. Hortic Sci Technol 39:547-559. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20210049

10.7235/HORT.20210049
3

Bertram L, Karlsen P (1994) Patterns in stem elongation rate in chrysanthemum and tomato plants in relation to irradiance and day/night temperature. Sci Hortic 58:139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(94)90134-1

10.1016/0304-4238(94)90134-1
4

Blanchard MG, Runkle ES (2007) The influence of day and night temperature fluctuations on growth and flowering of annual bedding plants and greenhouse heating cost predictions. HortScience 46:599-603. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.599

10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.599
5

Carmassi G, Incrocci L, Maggini R, Malorgio F, Tognoni F, Pardossi A (2007) An aggregated model for water requirements of greenhouse tomato grown in closed rockwool culture with saline water. Agricultural Water Management 88:73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.10.002

10.1016/j.agwat.2006.10.002
6

Erwin JE, Heins RD (1995) Thermomorphogenic responses in stem and leaf development. HortScience 30:940-949. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.5.940

10.21273/HORTSCI.30.5.940
7

Grimstad SO (1994) Low-temperature pulse affects growth and development of young cucumber and tomato plants. J Hortic Sci 70:75-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1995.11515275

10.1080/14620316.1995.11515275
8

Heuvelink E (1995) Dry matter production in a tomato crop: measurements and simulation. Ann Bot 75:369-379. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1035

10.1006/anbo.1995.1035
9

Heuvelink E (1996) Dry matter partitioning in tomato: validation of a dynamic simulation model. Ann Bot 77:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0009

10.1006/anbo.1996.0009
10

Kang M, Yang L, Zhang B, De Reffye P (2011) Correlation between dynamic tomato fruit-set and source–sink ratio: a common relationship for different plant densities and seasons?. Annals of Botany 107:805-815. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq244

10.1093/aob/mcq24421183453PMC3077983
11

Kim HM, Hwang SJ (2019) The growth and development of ‘Mini Chal’ tomato plug seedlings grown under various wavelengths using light emitting diodes. Agronomy 9:157. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030157

10.3390/agronomy9030157
12

Kim YH, Yang HC, Bae YH, Hyeon SJ, Hwang SJ, Kim DH, Jang DC (2023) Preventing overgrowth of cucumber and tomato seedlings using difference between day and night temperature in a plant factory with artificial lighting. Plants 12:3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173164

10.3390/plants1217316437687409PMC10490523
13

Kubota C, McClure MA, Kokalis-Burelle N, Bausher MG, Rosskopf EN (2008) Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. HortScience 43:1664-1669. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1664

10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1664
14

Langton FA, Cockshull KE (1997) Is stem extension determined by DIF or by absolute day and night temperatures? Sci Hortic 69:229-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00020-4

10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00020-4
15

Li LI, Jia LI, Gao Q, Chen JX (2015) Effects of day and night temperature difference on growth, development, yield and fruit quality of tomatoes. Chin J Appl Ecol 26:2827-2833.

16

Marcelis LFM (1996) Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant. J Exp Bot 47:1281-1291.

10.1093/jxb/47.Special_Issue.1281
17

Moore CE, Meacham-Hensold K, Lemonnier P, Slattery RA, Benjamin C, Bernacchi CJ et al. (2021) The effect of increasing temperature on crop photosynthesis: from enzymes to ecosystems. J Exp Bot 72:2822-2844. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab090

10.1093/jxb/erab09033619527PMC8023210
18

Myster J, Moe R (1995) Effect of diurnal temperature alternations on plant morphology in some greenhouse crops—a mini review. Sci Hortic 62:205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(95)00783-P

10.1016/0304-4238(95)00783-P
19

Ohtaka K, Yoshida A, Kakei Y, Fukui K, Kojima M, Takebayashi Y, Yano K, Imanishi S, Sakakibara H (2020) Difference between day and night temperatures affects stem elongation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings via regulation of gibberellin and auxin synthesis. Front Plant Sci 11:577235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.577235

10.3389/fpls.2020.57723533363551PMC7752778
20

Schwarz D, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Venema JH (2010) Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: Thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci Hortic 127:162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016

10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016
21

Si Y, Heins RD (1996) Influence of day and night temperatures on sweet pepper seedling development. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121:699-704.

10.21273/JASHS.121.4.699
22

Song J, Yang J, Jeong BR (2023) Difference between day and night temperature (DIF) and light intensity affect growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Panax ginseng Meyer sprouts. Plants 12:2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152820

10.3390/plants1215282037570974PMC10420926
23

Vaid TM, Runkle ES, Frantz JM (2014) Mean daily temperature regulates plant quality attributes of annual ornamental plants. HortScience 49:574-578. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.49.5.574

10.21273/HORTSCI.49.5.574
24

Van Iersel MW, Gianino D (2017) An adaptive control approach for light-emitting diode lights can reduce the energy costs of supplemental lighting in greenhouses. HortScience 52:72-77. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11385-16

10.21273/HORTSCI11385-16
25

Yamaura H, Kanno K, Iwasaki Y, Nakano A, Isozaki M (2023) Controlling growth and carbohydrate utilization of tomato seedlings through day-night temperature difference and high light intensity under elevated CO2 conditions. Sci Hortic 322:112427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112427

10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112427
페이지 상단으로 이동하기