All Issue

2016 Vol.25, Issue 3 Preview Page
Estimation of Leaf Area, Leaf Fresh Weight, and Leaf Dry Weight of Irwin Mango Grown in Greenhouse using Leaf Length, Leaf Width, Petiole Length, and SPAD Value

엽장, 엽폭, 엽병장 및 SPAD 값을 이용한 온실 재배 어윈 망고의 엽면적, 엽생체중과 엽건물중 추정

Dae Ho Jung1
,
Young Yeol Cho2
,
Jun Gu Lee3
,
Jung Eek Son1*
정 대호1
,
조 영열2
,
이 준구3
,
손 정익1*
1Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2Major of Horticultural Science, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea
3Department of Horticulture, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
1서울대학교 식물생산과학부
2제주대학교 원예환경전공
3전북대학교 원예학과
*sjeenv@snu.ac.kr
30 July 2016. pp. 146-152
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Due to complicate canopy structures of Irwin mangoes grown in greenhouses, it is difficult to determine their growth parameters accurately. Leaf area, leaf fresh weight, and leaf dry weight are widely used as indicators to diagnose the tree growth. Therefore, it is necessary to establish models that can non-destructively estimate these growth indicators. The objective of this study was to establish regression models to estimate leaf area, leaf fresh weight, and leaf dry weight of Irwin mangoes (Mangifera indica L. cv. Irwin) by using leaf length, leaf width, petiole length, and SPAD value. The input values of leaf length, leaf width, petiole length, and SPAD value of 6-year old Irwin mangoes were measured, and the corresponding output values of leaf area, leaf fresh weight, and leaf dry weight were also measured. After 14 models were selected among the existing models, coefficients of the models were estimated by regression analysis. Three models with higher R2 and lower RMSE values selected. In validation the R2 values for the selected models were 0.967, 0.743, and 0.567 in the leaf area, leaf fresh weight, and leaf dry weight models, respectively. It is concluded that this models will be helpful to conveniently diagnose the growth of the Irwin mango.

Keywords
canopy structure
light interception
non-destructive method
regression model
키워드
비파괴적 방법
수광
캐노피 구조
회귀모델
References
1
An, M.R., Y.S. Keum, and S.K. Lee. 2015. Comparative analysis of volatile flavor compounds in Taiwan apple mango and Philippines carabao mango. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 47:191-197.
10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.2.191
2
Antunes, W.C., M.F. Pompelli, D.M. Carretero, and F.M. DaMatta. 2008. Allometric models for non?destructive leaf area estimation in coffee (Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora). Annals of Applied Biology 153:33-40.
10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00235.x
3
Blanco, F.F., and M.V. Folegatti. 2005. Estimation of leaf area for greenhouse cucumber by linear measurements under salinity and grafting. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz.) 62:4.
10.1590/S0103-90162005000400001
4
Cho, Y.Y., S. Oh, M.M. Oh, and J.E. Son. 2007. Estimation of individual leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of hydroponically grown cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) using leaf length, width, and SPAD value. Scientia Horticulturae 111:330-334.
10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.028
5
Confalonieri, R., M. Foi, R. Casa. S. Aquaro, E. Tona, M. Peterle, A. Boldini, G. De Carli, A. Ferrari, G. Finotto, T. Cuarneri, V. Manzoni, E. Movedi, A. Nisoli, L. Paleari, I. Radici, M. Suardi, D. Veronesi, S. Bregaglio, G. Cappelli, M.E. Chiodini, P. Dominoni, C. Francone, N. Frasso, T. Stella, and M. Acutis. 2013. Development of an app for estimating leaf area index using a smartphone. Trueness and precision determination and comparison with other indirect methods. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 96:67-74.
10.1016/j.compag.2013.04.019
6
Gamiely, S., W.M. Randle, H.A. Mills, and D.A. Smittle. 1991. A rapid and nondestructive method for estimating leaf area of onions. HortScience 26:206.
10.21273/HORTSCI.26.2.206
7
Honsho, C., M. Inada, K. Yuji, M. Tojiki, S. Kurogi, S. Kanzaki, and T. Tetsumura. 2012. Efficiency of hybrid formation by open-pollination of two cultivars in a closed plastic house and the effect of the male parent on fruit characteristics in mango. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 81:27-34.
10.2503/jjshs1.81.27
8
Le Bail, M., M.H. Jeuffroy, C. Bouchard, and A. Barbottin. 2005. Is it possible to forecast the gran quality and yield of different varieties of winter wheat from Minolta SPAD meter measurements. European Journal of Agronomy 23:379-391.
10.1016/j.eja.2005.02.003
9
Lee, J.W., J.N. Eom, W.H. Kang, J.H. Shin, and J.E. Son. 2013. Prediction of transpiration rate of lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) in plant factory by Penman-Monteith model. Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory 22:182-187.
10.12791/KSBEC.2013.22.2.182
10
Lu, H.Y., C.T. Lu, M.L. Wei, and L.F. Chan. 2004. Comparison of different models for nondestructive leaf area estimation in taro. Agronomy Journal 96:448-453.
10.2134/agronj2004.4480
11
Montero, F.J., J.A. de Juan, A. Cuesta, and A. Brasa. 2000. Nondestructive methods to estimate leaf area in Vitis vinifera L. HortScience 35:696-698.
10.21273/HORTSCI.35.4.696
12
Naef, R., A. Velluz, and A. Jaquier. 2006. The perfume of carabao mangoes (Mangifera indica L.): Identification of uncommon unsaturated fatty acid esters in the SPME of the intact fruit. European Food Research and Technology 222:554-558.
10.1007/s00217-005-0132-9
13
O'neal, M.E., D.A. Landis, and R. Isaacs. 2002. An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. Journal of Economic Entomology 95:1190-1194.
10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.119012539831
14
Park, I.G., H.J. Yoon, M.A. Kim, K.Y. Lee, H.C. Park, and S.H. Kim. 2014. Effect on pollinating activities on mango flower by bumblebee (Bombus terrestris), honeybee (Apis mellifera) and oriental latrine fly (Chrysomyia megacephala) in green house. Journal of Apiculture 29:235-243.
10.17519/apiculture.2014.11.29.4.235
15
Peksen, E. 2007. Non-destructive leaf area estimation model for faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Scientia Horticulturae 113:322-328.
10.1016/j.scienta.2007.04.003
16
Serdar, Ü and H. Demirsoy. 2006. Non-destructive leaf area estimation in chestnut. Scientia Horticulturae 108:227-230.
10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.025
17
Sinoquet, H., S. Thanisawanyangkura, H. Mabrouk, and P. Kasemsap. 1998. Characterization of the light environment in canopies using 3D digitising and image processing. Annals of Botany 82:203-212.
10.1006/anbo.1998.0665
18
Smart, R.E. 1985. Principles of grapevine canopy microclimate manipulation with implications for yield and quality: a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 36:230-239.
19
Williams, L.E. 1987. Growth of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines. I. Leaf area development and dry weight distribution. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 112:325-330.
20
Yonemoto, Y. 2006. Tropical fruit. p. 100-106. In: the Japanese society for horticultural science (ed.). Horticulture in Japan 2006. Shoukadoh Publication, Kyoto.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory
  • Journal Title(Ko) :시설원예ㆍ식물공장
  • Volume : 25
  • No :3
  • Pages :146-152
  • Received Date : 2016-07-28
  • Revised Date : 2016-09-01
  • Accepted Date : 2016-09-01
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2016.25.3.146
Journal Informaiton Journal of Bio-Environment Control Journal of Bio-Environment Control
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close